Abstract:The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism was developed to ensure that industrial sectors operating outside the EU follow the same environmental standards and targets while competing with the EU's carbon market. This mechanism aims to calculate the carbon footprint of goods and services imported into the EU and make carbon adjustments accordingly. The transition phase, starting in 2023, represents the period when the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism will be implemented. The completion of the transition phase is targeted for 2025. By this date, the effective implementation of this mechanism is aimed at demonstrating that countries outside of the EU comply with emissions regulations using Carbon at Border certificates. The textile industry's products have a significant environmental impact throughout their life cycle, from the production of raw materials to the disposal of the finished product. Textile production, especially synthetic yarns, requires large amounts of energy, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. In this study, a "cradle-to-customer plus waste" life cycle assessment (LCA) is conducted to evaluate the environmental impacts of two products in the textile sector. The Monte Carlo analysis method can be used to handle uncertainties in LCA calculations. It is a method for modeling uncertainties and statistically evaluating results. In this study, this method is preferred at the stage of determining uncertainties. The processes from chips to yarns are investigated for two synthetic yarns: polyester (PES) and polypropylene (PP). The carbon emissions of PP and PES used in textiles are calculated for the first time in this study using detailed modeling with LCAs and a real application. The main production operations are considered: (i) transport of raw materials and packaging material, (ii) energy consumption during the production process, (iii) transport of products, and (iv) end-of-life steps. When the actual data obtained from a company are analyzed, the carbon footprints (CFs) of the PES and PP are calculated to be 13.40 t CO2-eq (t PES)-1 and 6.42 t CO2-eq (t PP)-1, respectively. These data can be used as reference points for future studies and comparisons. According to the results obtained, when the energy consumption and raw material stages in the production of the PES and PP products are compared, it is seen that the CF of PP yarn is lower, and it is more environmentally friendly. These findings can be utilized to enhance government policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and managing synthetic yarn production in Türkiye. Since PP and PES raw materials are predominantly used in synthetic yarns, this study's objective is to quantify the carbon emissions associated with the utilization of these raw materials and provide guidance to companies engaged in their production.

Carbon footprint and water footprint assessment of virgin and recycled polyester textiles

PEF Plastic Synthesized from Industrial Carbon Dioxide and Biowaste

Investigation of the Carbon Footprint of the Textile Industry: PES- and PP-Based Products with Monte Carlo Uncertainty Analysis

Discussion on key issues of carbon footprint accounting for bast fiber textiles

A Life Cycle Analysis of a Polyester–Wool Blended Fabric and Associated Carbon Emissions in the Textile Industry

A systematic review of the life cycle environmental performance of cotton textile products

Climate Change and the Textile Industry: The Carbon Footprint of Dyes

Evaluating Environmental Impact of Natural and Synthetic Fibers: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

Life-cycle assessment of continuous pad-dyeing technology for cotton fabrics

Improved design for textile production process based on life cycle assessment

Corporate Water Footprint of Textile Industry: Methodology and Case Study

Review of carbon footprint assessment in textile industry

Comparing the financial costs and carbon neutrality of polyester fibres produced from 100% bio-based PET, 100% recycled PET, or in combination

Development of a novel process-level water footprint assessment for textile production based on modularity

Advancements in component separation through chemical methods for recycled polyester/cotton blended textiles

Progress toward Circularity of Polyester and Cotton Textiles

Carbon footprint and oxygen footprint assessment of hemp yarn

Environmental perspectives of textile waste, environmental pollution and recycling

Assessing the potential of GHG emissions for the textile sector: A baseline study

Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from the printing and dyeing wastewater treatment and reuse system: Potential pathways towards carbon neutrality

Potential trade-off between water consumption and water quality: life cycle assessment of nonaqueous solvent dyeing