Corporate Water Footprint of Textile Industry: Methodology and Case Study

Qing-qing SUN,Xin-yu HUANG,Lei SHI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2014.08.14
2014-01-01
Abstract:Corporate water footprint can provide guidelines for enterprises to reduce water consumption and protect the water environment.Based on field survey and literature review,a general corporate water flowchart was outlined,and a framework was established to calculate corporate blue water,green water and grey water footprint. The blue water footprint refers to consumption of blue water resources( i. e.,surface and groundwater) along the supply chain of a product. The green water footprint refers to consumption of green water resources.The grey water footprint refers to pollution,and is defined as the volume of freshwater that is required to assimilate the load of pollutants given natural concentrations and existing ambient water quality standards. The present study explores the potential to calculate the contribution and/or reduction of different measures,and seeks to comprehend the internal water use information,such as the entire plant's water balance,detail of water use,water yield for water conservation and recycling measures. Considering a textile and dyeing plant as an example,the water footprints before and after a cleaner production audit were calculated. The results show: 1) By measuring per unit production,the blue water footprint was reduced by 26. 3% to 171 t/t; the green water footprint per unit production increased from 0 t/t to8 t/t; and,the grey water footprint per unit production was reduced by 31. 1% to 146 t/t. 2) By conserving and recycling water,the blue water footprints were reduced by 17,700 t and 16,000 t,respectively,and the grey water footprints were reduced by 486,000 t and578,000 t,respectively. The research aims to further refine the methodology of the water footprints so that it serves various purposes in different sectors of the industrial society,while striving for coherence,consistency and scientific validity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?