Abstract:The cost of going public attracts concerns of both academia and practitioners.Along with the growing prosperity of market economy and the deeper reform of monetary system,China's capital market has developed fast in the past twenty years and has expanded to a large scale.Unlike the prosperity of capital market,prior literature mainly focuses on the issuance cost of going public,including the direct issuance cost (e.g.underwriting fees or audit fees) and indirect issuance cost (e.g.IPO underpricing).In addition to this,the current literature pays little attention to indirect cost.Corporate income tax usually accounts for about 1/4～1/3 of corporate's profit.Thus,the effect of going public on the cost of corporate income tax would be an important aspect of indirect cost of going public,which provides an urgent question for the scholars.The effect of going public on the cost of corporate income tax mainly reflects on the changes of tax planning behavior.Although the determinants of the degree and economic consequences of corporate tax planning behavior have received extensive attention,literature on this field is still limited.Shackelford and Shevlin(2001)called for scholars to conduct more research on the determinants of tax planning behavior after reviewing the literature in the tax field.In another word,researches on how to go public affect tax planning behavior may enrich the literature on determinants of tax planning behavior to some extent.Based on the effective tax planning framework proposed by Scholes et al.(2002),going public affects tax planning behavior through four paths.Firstly,financial reporting costs of tax planning will increase due to more dispersed ownership.Secondly,increased information disclosure requirements will increase the transaction cost of tax planning.Thirdly,increased information disclosure requirements will also increase the tax audit cost of tax planning.Fourthly,stock price protect mechanism will increase the stock price crash risk caused by the "rent extraction" behavior which is hidden by tax planning behavior.We predict that the non-tax cost of tax planning increases after going public,which will cause corporations to be less tax aggressive after going public.Besides,from the perspective of ownership and debt levels,we also propose two sub-hypotheses on cross-sectional differences of corporate tax aggressiveness change after going public.The first hypothesis is that compared with non-state-owned enterprises,state-owned enterprises' tax aggressiveness decreases more after going public.The second hypothesis is that the decline level of tax aggressiveness after going public is positively related to the debt levels after going public.In order to test these two hypotheses,this paper uses effective tax rate and long-run effective tax rate to measure corporate tax aggressiveness.Our sample consists of initial public offering firms during 2002 to 2006,including pre and post 3 years (including IPO year) of the 1PO year.The empirical results suggest:(1) After going public,both current effective tax rate and long-run effective tax rate increase significantly,which implies that corporates become less tax aggressive due to the non-tax cost of tax planning;(2) Compared with non-state-owned enterprises,state-owned enterprises' tax aggressiveness increases more significantly,which suggests state-owned enterprises become much less tax aggressive after going public;and (3) Debt level is positively related to the rise level of effective tax rate,which suggests that corporates with higher debt level become much less tax aggressive.Our findings provide empirical evidence not only on the determinants of tax planning,but also on the change of corporate income tax cost due to IPO.This paper finds that going public would decrease corporate's tax aggressiveness,and the financial reporting cost has moderate effect on the change of tax aggressiveness.Future scholars may want to replicate this study from other specific non-tax costs perspectives,and provide more empirical evidence on how going public would affect corporate tax planning behavior.

Does Increased Visibility to the IRS Cause Public Firms to Go Private? Evidence from FIN 48

Equity Financing Incentive and Corporate Disclosure: New Causal Evidence from SEO Deregulation

Do Private Equity Investors Conspire with Ultimate Owners in the IPO Process?

(Un)intended Consequences of a Mandatory Dividend Payout Regulation for Earnings Management: Evidence From a Natural Experiment:

IRS scrutiny and corporate innovation

Does the Public Availability of Market Participantss Trading Data Affect Firm Disclosure? Evidence from Short Sellers

Does the mandatory disclosure of suppliers' tax uncertainties affect supply chain relations?

The Disciplinary Role of Financial Statements: Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions of Privately Held Targets

The Wealth Change and Redistribution Effects of Sarbanes-Oxley Internal Control Disclosures

Tax Aggressiveness and Corporate Transparency

Economic Determinants and Consequences of the Proactive Disclosure of Internal Control Weaknesses and Remediation Progress in IPOs

Does external finance pressure affect corporate disclosure of Chinese non-state-owned enterprises?

The impact of changing disclosure requirements, competition, and private capital on firm exit methods and premiums

Does going public affect corporate tax planning behavior?

Determinants of Management Ownership of Unrestricted Equity: Overconfidence Versus Tax Explanations

Short-Selling Pressure and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness

Do Private Equity Sponsors Sacrifice Long-Term Value for Short-Term Profit? Evidence from a Comprehensive Sample of Large Buyouts and Exit Outcomes

Do Private Equity Returns Result from Wealth Transfers and Short-Termism? Evidence from a Comprehensive Sample of Large Buyouts

Mandatory ESG Disclosure, Information Asymmetry, and Litigation Risk: Evidence from Initial Public Offerings

Does Private Country-by-Country Reporting Deter Tax Avoidance and Income Shifting? Evidence from BEPS Action Item 13

Voluntary Information Disclosure at IPO