Abstract:Purpose As more companies choose to disclose corporate social responsibility (CSR) information, it is important to gain an understanding of the quality of disclosures and factors that influence quality. The purpose of this study is to examine the role of culture as a determinant of the quality of voluntary carbon emission disclosures. Design/methodology/approach This study uses regression analysis to test the influence of culture on the quality of carbon disclosures. The sample of this study comes from companies who voluntarily report to the carbon disclosure project. The authors operationalize the quality of disclosure using the Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index. The authors operationalize cultural values using both Hofstede's metrics (Hofstede, 1980) and Project GLOBE (House et al., 2004). Findings This study predicts and finds a negative relationship between quality of disclosure and high individualism scores. This study also finds that the quality of disclosure is lower for companies located in countries with high power distance scores. The authors find that the quality of disclosure is higher for companies located in countries with gender/assertiveness scores that indicate a higher value on the environment than on the importance of economic growth. While quality is marginally related to uncertainty avoidance using Hofstede's measure, quality is not related to uncertainty avoidance using the Project GLOBE metric. The authors did not find a hypothesized negative significant relationship between quality and long-term orientation. Practical implications Quality is a measure of importance to users and regulators of disclosures. Social implications National culture is an important determinant of CSR disclosure quality. Originality/value This study extends the previous research by using a metric for quality based on an independent evaluation of disclosures and by the role of culture in a multi-country study.

The role of national culture as a lens for stakeholder evaluation of corporate social performance and its effect on corporate reputation

The effects of national culture on corporate social responsibility disclosure: a cross-country comparison

Does national culture influence corporate social responsibility on firm performance?

The Moderating Effect of Cultural Values on the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Performance

The impact of national culture on corporate social performance

The Impact of Organizational Culture on the Effectiveness of Corporate Governance to Control Earnings Management

Corporate governance, environmental sustainability performance, and normative isomorphic force of national culture

Host country cultural profile and the performance of foreign subsidiaries in Latin America

The impact of national culture on corporate social responsibility: evidence from cross-regional comparison

Where does ESG pay? The role of national culture in moderating the relationship between ESG performance and financial performance

Latest trends and initiatives in corporate social responsibility: A communicational analysis of successful cases of arts and culture in Spain

How corporate social responsibility activities influence employer reputation: The role of social media capability

The Pressure Behind Corporate Social Performance: Ownership and Institutional Configurations

National culture and firm-level carbon emissions: a global perspective

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm performance: does national culture matter?

Comparing the effects of consumers' perceptions of companies' corporate social responsibility initiatives in emerging and developed markets

Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure effect

National culture: The missing country-level determinant of corporate governance

Interpreting and responding to strategic issues: The impact of national culture

Cultural influences on the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosures: an examination of carbon disclosure

National culture and environmental, social, governance controversies: a cross-country evidence