Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to find out how corporate social responsibility (CSR) is viewed in the Chinese situation. The paper views CSR as an endogenous motivation for corporate social behaviour. The intended contributions of this paper are twofold. On the one hand, the authors intend to collect first‐hand data to understand the current status of Chinese managers' cognitions of CSR. On the other hand the paper intends to analyse the differences which exist in managers' cognitions on CSR among different kinds of firms in a Chinese context.Design/methodology/approachA random survey was conducted among 157 businessmen using the force‐choice questionnaire, based on the four‐part construct proposed by Carroll. The confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to test the construct validity of Carroll's conceptual model with the data sample drawn from Chinese situation. Then correlation, six pairwise t‐tests and MANOVA test were conducted for the purpose of this study.FindingsChinese managers' cognition of CSR is found to be consistent with the four‐component construct. A relatively strong preference toward economic component has been examined. The results present a significant negative correlation between economic cognition and all three of its non‐economic counterparts. No significant cognitive differences have been verified between firms with different characteristics.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper initially examined the cognition of Chinese managers toward CSR. Chinese managers are viewed as having an important role in decision making on social issues. However, how to promote the managers' cognition of CSR is needed for future research which will also examine the internal driving mechanism of CSR.Originality/valueThere has not been a great deal of empirical research done in the field of social responsibility in China. This study is a starting point for those who seek to understand the economic and sociological aspects of mainland Chinese business.

The impact of national culture on corporate social responsibility: evidence from cross-regional comparison

The impact of national culture on corporate social performance

Does national culture influence corporate social responsibility on firm performance?

Chinese Managers' Cognition of Corporate Social Responsibility: an Empirical Investigation

National culture and firm-level carbon emissions: a global perspective

The effects of national culture on corporate social responsibility disclosure: a cross-country comparison

International operations and sustainable development: Should national culture matter?

Global Business, Global Responsibilities

National culture and environmental, social, governance controversies: a cross-country evidence

The influence of corporate social responsibility and social values on bank performance: A global study

The Impact of Societal Culture on the Use of Performance Strategies in East Asia: Evidence from a Comparative Survey

The effects of corporate social responsibility on employees' affective commitment: A cross-cultural investigation.

Does Csr Practice Pay off in East Asian Firms? A Meta-Analytic Investigation

The Impact of Employee Perceptions of Organizational Corporate Social Responsibility Practices on Job Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Evidence from the Chinese Private Sector

The Impact of National Culture on CEO Compensation and Salary Gaps Between CEOs and Manufacturing Workers

The role of national culture as a lens for stakeholder evaluation of corporate social performance and its effect on corporate reputation

Cultural inclusivity and corporate social responsibility in China

Cultural influences on the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosures: an examination of carbon disclosure

Examining the impact of Culture's consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions.

Bridging Cultural Dimensions and Corporate Social Responsibility Communication

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Value : An Empirical Study of Top 100 Global Brands