Effects of Bagging and Bias Correction on Estimators Defined by Estimating Equations
SX Chen,P Hall
IF: 1.4
2003-01-01
Statistica Sinica
Abstract:Bagging an estimator approximately doubles its bias through the impact of bagging on quadratic terms in expansions of the estimator. This dicult y can be alleviated by bagging a suitably bias-corrected estimator, however. In these and other circumstances, what is the overall impact of bagging and/or bias cor- rection, and how can it be characterised? We answer these questions in the case of general estimators dened by estimating equations, including for example max- imum likelihood and method of moments estimators. It is shown that, despite the considerable variety of estimators that can be constructed by bagging and bias cor- rection, the number of modes of behaviour is very small. In particular, bagging a bias-corrected estimator produces a new estimator that is second-order equivalent to the original, unadjusted estimator. Furthermore, the conventional bagged es- timator, and the standard bias-corrected estimator, represent virtually equal but opposite adjustments of the conventional estimator. In particular, bagging adds back the adjustment provided by bias correction. If we bag a doubly bias corrected estimator, constructed so as to counteract the tendency of bagging to exacerbate bias, then the result is an estimator that is second-order equivalent to the standard bias-corrected estimator. These results do not depend on the manner of bias cor- rection; that procedure may be implemented using the jackknife, the parametric bootstrap or the nonparametric bootstrap. They show that, when bagging is ap- plied to relatively conventional statistical problems, it cannot reliably be expected to improve performance. Its domain is, in eect, restricted to problems such as regression trees, where variability is so high that it cannot be plausibly modelled using the approach taken here.