Abstract:Random forests are a learning algorithm proposed by Breiman [Mach. Learn. 45 (2001) 5--32] that combines several randomized decision trees and aggregates their predictions by averaging. Despite its wide usage and outstanding practical performance, little is known about the mathematical properties of the procedure. This disparity between theory and practice originates in the difficulty to simultaneously analyze both the randomization process and the highly data-dependent tree structure. In the present paper, we take a step forward in forest exploration by proving a consistency result for Breiman's [Mach. Learn. 45 (2001) 5--32] original algorithm in the context of additive regression models. Our analysis also sheds an interesting light on how random forests can nicely adapt to sparsity. 1. Introduction. Random forests are an ensemble learning method for classification and regression that constructs a number of randomized decision trees during the training phase and predicts by averaging the results. Since its publication in the seminal paper of Breiman (2001), the procedure has become a major data analysis tool, that performs well in practice in comparison with many standard methods. What has greatly contributed to the popularity of forests is the fact that they can be applied to a wide range of prediction problems and have few parameters to tune. Aside from being simple to use, the method is generally recognized for its accuracy and its ability to deal with small sample sizes, high-dimensional feature spaces and complex data structures. The random forest methodology has been successfully involved in many practical problems, including air quality prediction (winning code of the EMC data science global hackathon in 2012, see <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://www.kaggle.com/c/dsg-hackathon" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>), chemoinformatics [Svetnik et al. (2003)], ecology [Prasad, Iverson and Liaw (2006), Cutler et al. (2007)], 3D

Bias-corrected Random Forests in Regression

Analysis of purely random forests bias

Boosting Random Forests to Reduce Bias; One-Step Boosted Forest and Its Variance Estimate

Randomization Can Reduce Both Bias and Variance: A Case Study in Random Forests

Exact Bias Correction for Linear Adjustment of Randomized Controlled Trials

Towards generating random forests via extremely randomized trees

The Conditioning Bias in Binary Decision Trees and Random Forests and Its Elimination

Correcting Classifiers for Sample Selection Bias in Two-Phase Case-Control Studies

Asymptotic Properties of High-Dimensional Random Forests

Consistency of random forests

Addressing bias in bagging and boosting regression models

Learning de-biased regression trees and forests from complex samples

Trees, Forests, Chickens, and Eggs: When and Why to Prune Trees in a Random Forest

Censored Quantile Regression Forests

Bernoulli Random Forests: Closing the Gap Between Theoretical Consistency and Empirical Soundness.

Bias Correction for Fixed Effects Spatial Panel Data Models

Bias Correction and Refined Inferences for Fixed Effects Spatial Panel Data Models

Inference with Mondrian Random Forests

Consistent Estimation of Residual Variance with Random Forest Out-Of-Bag Errors

Random Forests: some methodological insights

Bias correction for multiple covariate analysis using empirical bayesian estimation in mixed-effects models for longitudinal data