Abstract:This paper studies inference in randomized controlled trials with covariate-adaptive randomization when there are multiple treatments. More specifically, we study in this setting inference about the average effect of one or more treatments relative to other treatments or a control. As in Bugni et al.(2018), covariate-adaptive randomization refers to randomization schemes that first stratify according to baseline covariates and then assign treatment status so as to achieve “balance” within each stratum. Importantly, in contrast to Bugni et al. (2018), we not only allow for multiple treatments, but further allow for the proportion of units being assigned to each of the treatments to vary across strata. We first study the properties of estimators derived from a “fully saturated” linear regression, i.e., a linear regression of the outcome on all interactions between indicators for each of the treatments and indicators for each of the strata. We show that tests based on these estimators using the usual heteroskedasticity-consistent estimator of the asymptotic variance are invalid in the sense that they may have limiting rejection probability under the null hypothesis strictly greater than the nominal level; on the other hand, tests based on these estimators and suitable estimators of the asymptotic variance that we provide are exact in the sense that they have limiting rejection probability under the null hypothesis equal to the nominal level. For the special case in which the target proportion of units being assigned to each of the treatments does not vary across strata, we additionally consider tests based on estimators derived from a linear regression with “strata fixed effects,” i.e., a linear regression of the outcome on indicators for each of the treatments and indicators for each of the strata. We show that tests based on these estimators using the usual heteroskedasticity-consistent estimator of the asymptotic variance are conservative in the sense that they have limiting rejection probability under the null hypothesis no greater than and typically strictly less than the nominal level, but tests based on these estimators and suitable estimators of the asymptotic variance that we provide are exact, thereby generalizing results in Bugni et al. (2018) for the case of a single treatment to multiple treatments. A simulation study and an empirical application illustrate the practical relevance of our theoretical results.

Exact Bias Correction for Linear Adjustment of Randomized Controlled Trials

The covariate-adjusted residual estimator and its use in both randomized trials and observational settings

Regression Analysis for Covariate-Adaptive Randomization: A Robust and Efficient Inference Perspective

A general theory of regression adjustment for covariate-adaptive randomization: OLS, Lasso, and beyond

Machine Learning Assisted Adjustment Boosts Inferential Efficiency of Randomized Controlled Trials

Testing for Treatment Effect in Covariate-Adaptive Randomized Clinical Trials with Generalized Linear Models and Omitted Covariates

Lasso-adjusted treatment effect estimation under covariate-adaptive randomization

Covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs for generalized linear models

Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: a principled yet flexible approach

Covariate adjustment and prediction of mean response in randomised trials

Regression-adjusted Average Treatment Effect Estimates in Stratified Randomized Experiments

Bias correction for multiple covariate analysis using empirical bayesian estimation in mixed-effects models for longitudinal data

The Use of Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Controlled Trials: An Overview

Debiased regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with moderately high-dimensional covariates

Lasso Adjustments Of Treatment Effect Estimates In Randomized Experiments

An Empirical Likelihood Approach to Nonparametric Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Clinical Trials

Automated, efficient and model-free inference for randomized clinical trials via data-driven covariate adjustment

Regression Adjustment for Estimating Distributional Treatment Effects in Randomized Controlled Trials

The Use of Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Remove Bias in Observational Studies

Inference under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization with Multiple Treatments

A meta-analytic framework to adjust for bias in external control studies