Abstract:Statement of problem: The light source stability of digital cameras and smartphones is important in shade matching in restorative and prosthetic dentistry to communicate objectively with the dental laboratory. Techniques that standardize the light source of such devices are lacking, and this limitation can lead to color mismatches, difficulties in color communication, and treatment documentation. Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the magnitude of color difference (ΔE) among 3 shade selection methods during the fabrication of ceramic crowns: visual shade selection with a shade guide, digital shade selection with a digital camera and cross-polarizing filter, and digital shade selection with a smartphone and a light-correcting device. Material and methods: Forty-five patients in need of ceramic crowns were enrolled, and shade selection was evaluated according to different protocols: visual shade selection (A-D shade guide and IPS Natural Die Material Shade Guide, sent to the dental laboratory technician via a laboratory prescription); digital shade selection with a digital camera (D7000; Nikon Corp) with an 85-mm lens and wireless close-up flash, with and without a cross-polarizing filter (Polar eyes); and digital shade selection with a smartphone and a light-correcting device (iPhone XS attached to Smile Lite MDP, with and without its cross-polarizing filter accessory). Information from the smartphone was imported to an app (IPS e.max Shade Navigation App; Ivoclar AG) that converted the reading to a shade and level of translucency for the ceramic restoration. For all photographs, a gray reference card with known color values was positioned by the mandibular teeth and was used for white balancing of the digital photographs with a software program. All photographs were edited and sent to the dental laboratory: white-balanced with the shade guide; white-balanced with the substrate shade guide; black and white; saturated; and cross-polarized. Ceramic crowns were made with the same lithium disilicate material (IPS e.max CAD; Ivoclar AG) and cemented with the same resin cement (RelyX Ultimate Clicker, A3 shade; 3M). The ΔE values between the crown and the adjacent tooth were determined. The data were analyzed by using a 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc tests (α=.05). Results: The mean ΔE between a cemented ceramic crown and the adjacent tooth in the visual shade selection group was 5.32, significantly different than both digital camera (ΔE=2.75; P=.002) and smartphone (ΔE=2.34; P=.001), which were not different from each other (P=.857). Conclusions: The digital shade selection with photographs acquired with both a digital camera and a smartphone with a light-correcting device showed a threshold within the acceptable values (ΔE<3.7), whereas the visual shade selection showed an average ΔE above the threshold for acceptable values (ΔE>3.7). The use of a gray reference card helped standardize the white balance from the digital images.

Color assessment of resin composite by using cellphone images compared with a spectrophotometer

Reliability of the color measurement of resin composites using images obtained using a stereoscopic loupe

Comparison of instrumental methods for color change assessment of Giomer resins

Fluorescence intensities of composite resins on photo images

A comparison of ceramic crown color difference between different shade selection methods: Visual, digital camera, and smartphone

Variability of color matching with different digital photography techniques and a gray reference card

Evaluation of polymerization-dependent changes in color and translucency of resin composites using two formulae

Evaluation of Color Matching Ability of a Single Shaded Resin Composite Versus a Single Translucency Resin Composite With Different Teeth Shades

Comparison of CIELAB ΔE* and CIEDE2000 color-differences after polymerization and thermocycling of resin composites

Evaluation of Single-Shade Composite Resin Color Matching on Extracted Human Teeth

In Vitro Comparison of Optical Properties Between Single-Shade and Conventional Composite Resin Restorations

Assessing color mismatch in single-shade composite resins for enamel replacement

Evaluation of different color measurement methods for determining tooth color

Evaluating the Color Matching Ability of a Smart Chromatic Technology-Based Composite Resin for Premolar Teeth Restoration

Color, lightness, chroma, hue, and translucency adjustment potential of resin composites using CIEDE2000 color difference formula

Color-Matching and Blending-Effect of Universal Shade Bulk-Fill-Resin-Composite in Resin-Composite-Models and Natural Teeth

Visual evaluation of the color adjustment of single-shade and group shade resin composites in restorations with different cavity configurations

Comparative analysis of optical and numerical models for reflectance and color prediction of monolithic dental resin composites with varying thicknesses

Spectrophotometric analysis of clinical factors related to the color of ceramic restorations: A pilot study

Evaluation of the Color Stability of Three Resin-Ceramic Materials Using a Spectrophotometer and a Digital Photography Software

Clinical Tooth Color Matching: In Vivo Comparisons of Digital Photocolorimetric and Spectrophotometric Analyses.