Abstract:Current approaches to biodiversity conservation are largely based on geographic areas, ecosystems, ecological communities, and species, with less attention on genetic diversity and the evolutionary continuum from populations to species. Conservation management generally rests on discrete categories, such as identified species, and, for threated taxa, intraspecific units. Species, in particular, provide a common measure of biodiversity yet in both theory and nature, speciation is typically a protracted process progressing from connected populations to unambiguous species with variable rates of phenotypic, ecological and genetic divergence. Thus, most recognized species are not genetically uniform and are sometimes highly structured into historically isolated populations worthy of consideration as intraspecific units that represent unique genetic diversity for conservation. Genome screens offer unprecedented resolution of structure across taxonomic boundaries in species complexes, and have the potential to oversplit species if not interpreted conservatively. This highlights the blurred line between populations and species, and can confound simple dichotomies of “species” vs. “not species.” At the same time, like plants, there is increasing evidence that even distantly related animal species can hybridize and exchange genes. A review of conservation legislation reveals that legal definitions of “species” are quite flexible and can accommodate a range of infra-specifictaxa and divergent populations, as well as taxonomically recognized species. For example, the legislative definition of a species around the world can include: species, subspecies, varieties, and geographically and/or genetically distinct populations. In principle, this flexibility allows for protection of genetic diversity and maintenance of evolutionary processes at a broad range of infra-specific levels. However, evolutionary biologists often fail to adequately justify and then translate their evidence for genetically defined units into categories suited to assessment under local legislation. We recommend that (i) genomic data should be interpreted conservatively when formally naming species, (ii) concomitantly, there should be stronger impetus and a more uniform approach to identifying clearly justified intraspecific units, (iii) guidelines be developed for recognizing and labeling intraspecific data that align with best scientific practice, and (iv) that the more nuanced view of species and speciation emerging from genomic analyses is communicated more effectively by scientists to decision makers.

Global Commitments to Conserving and Monitoring Genetic Diversity Are Now Necessary and Feasible

Gaps in the global protection of terrestrial genetic diversity

Monitoring of species' genetic diversity in Europe varies greatly and overlooks potential climate change impacts

Too simple, too complex, or just right? Advantages, challenges, and guidance for indicators of genetic diversity

Genetic diversity loss in the Anthropocene will continue long after habitat destruction ends

Multinational evaluation of genetic diversity indicators for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Importance of timely metadata curation to the global surveillance of genetic diversity

Building meaningful collaboration in conservation genetics and genomics

Genomics and conservation: Guidance from training to analyses and applications

Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing With the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics

Plant Conservation Practitioners Can Benefit from Neutral Genetic Diversity

Monitoring biodiversity in the global change era: The importance of herbaria and genetic diversity

New developments in the field of genomic technologies and their relevance to conservation management

Crop wild relatives - Undervalued, underutilized and under threat?

Monitoring bias for genetic diversity

Conservation of Biodiversity and Genetic Resources for Sustainable Agriculture

The coming of age of conservation genetics in Latin America: what has been achieved and what needs to be done

Understanding the conservation-genetics gap in Latin America: challenges and opportunities to integrate genetics into conservation practices

Genomic Diversity as a Key Conservation Criterion: Proof‐of‐Concept From Mammalian Whole‐Genome Resequencing Data

How genomics can help biodiversity conservation

Genetic diversity and IUCN Red List status