Abstract:Diversity plays an important role in various domains, including conservation, whether it describes diversity within a population or diversity over a set of species. While various strategies for measuring among-species diversity have emerged (e.g. Phylogenetic Diversity (PD), Split System Diversity (SSD) and entropy-based methods), extensions to populations are rare. An understudied problem is how to assess the diversity of a collection of populations where each has its own internal diversity. Relying solely on measures that treat each population as a monomorphic lineage (like a species) can be misleading. To address this problem, we present four population-level diversity assessment approaches: Pooling, Averaging, Pairwise Differencing, and Fixing. These approaches can be used to extend any diversity measure that is primarily defined for a group of individuals to a collection of populations. We then apply the approaches to two measures of diversity that have been used in conservation—Heterozygosity (Het) and Split System Diversity (SSD)—across a dataset comprising SNP data for 50 anadromous Atlantic salmon populations. We investigate agreement and disagreement between these measures of diversity when used to identify optimal sets of populations for conservation, on both the observed data, and randomized and simulated datasets. The similarity and differences of the maximum-diversity sets as well as the pairwise correlations among our proposed measures emphasize the need to clearly define what aspects of biodiversity we aim to both measure and optimize, to ensure meaningful and effective conservation decisions. Measuring diversity has several implications including conservation prioritization. However, accurately assessing genetic diversity across multiple populations while considering both within and among population variations is often overlooked. Our study addresses this gap by introducing four novel methods, allowing a better understanding of measuring diversity across populations from different perspectives. We applied these methods to simulated data and data from Atlantic salmon populations. The results sometimes disagree on which populations are most important for conservation, highlighting the need for clear biodiversity goals in conservation decisions. It's important to note that there isn't a single correct answer to the question of how to measure diversity, and the best approach is likely to depend on the conservation priorities and criteria under consideration. By understanding the reason behind these differences, we can make more informed choices to protect our natural world. This research contributes to a broader understanding of diversity and can help guide areas where measuring diversity is important.

Monitoring bias for genetic diversity

Monitoring of species' genetic diversity in Europe varies greatly and overlooks potential climate change impacts

Monitoring biodiversity in the global change era: The importance of herbaria and genetic diversity

Global Commitments to Conserving and Monitoring Genetic Diversity Are Now Necessary and Feasible

Measuring genetic diversity across populations

Gaps in the global protection of terrestrial genetic diversity

Too simple, too complex, or just right? Advantages, challenges, and guidance for indicators of genetic diversity

Sampling Biases Shape Our View of the Natural World

A genetic warning system for a hierarchically structured wildlife monitoring framework

Understanding and monitoring the consequences of human impacts on intraspecific variation

Genome-Wide and Trait-Specific Markers: A Perspective in Designing Conservation Programs

Linking the spatial and genomic structure of adaptive potential for conservation management: a review

Coupling in situ and remote sensing data to assess $α$- and $β$-diversity over biogeographic gradients

Multinational evaluation of genetic diversity indicators for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Effective population size of adult and offspring cohorts as a genetic monitoring tool in two stand-forming and wind-pollinated tree species: Fagus sylvatica L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst.

Expanding the spatial scale in DNA-based monitoring schemes: ascertainment bias in transnational assessments

Integrating spatial and ecological information into comprehensive biodiversity monitoring on agricultural land

Comparative population genetics of habitat-forming octocorals in two marine protected areas: eco-evolutionary and management implications

Global determinants of freshwater and marine fish genetic diversity

Rolling down that mountain: microgeographical adaptive divergence during a fast population expansion along a steep environmental gradient in European beech

Trends in genome diversity of small populations under a conservation program: a case study of two French chicken breeds