Abstract:Background: Nystagmus identification and interpretation is challenging for non-experts who lack specific training in neuro-ophthalmology or neuro-otology. This challenge is magnified when the task is performed via telemedicine. Deep learning models have not been heavily studied in video-based eye movement detection. Methods: We developed, trained, and validated a deep-learning system (aEYE) to classify video recordings as normal or bearing at least two consecutive beats of nystagmus. The videos were retrospectively collected from a subset of the monocular (right eye) video-oculography (VOG) recording used in the Acute Video-oculography for Vertigo in Emergency Rooms for Rapid Triage (AVERT) clinical trial (#NCT02483429). Our model was derived from a preliminary dataset representing about 10% of the total AVERT videos ( n = 435). The videos were trimmed into 10-sec clips sampled at 60 Hz with a resolution of 240 × 320 pixels. We then created 8 variations of the videos by altering the sampling rates (i.e., 30 Hz and 15 Hz) and image resolution (i.e., 60 × 80 pixels and 15 × 20 pixels). The dataset was labeled as "nystagmus" or "no nystagmus" by one expert provider. We then used a filtered image-based motion classification approach to develop aEYE. The model's performance at detecting nystagmus was calculated by using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: An ensemble between the ResNet-soft voting and the VGG-hard voting models had the best performing metrics. The AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.86, 88.4, 74.2, and 82.7%, respectively. Our validated folds had an average AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.86, 80.3, 80.9, and 80.4%, respectively. Models created from the compressed videos decreased in accuracy as image sampling rate decreased from 60 Hz to 15 Hz. There was only minimal change in the accuracy of nystagmus detection when decreasing image resolution and keeping sampling rate constant. Conclusion: Deep learning is useful in detecting nystagmus in 60 Hz video recordings as well as videos with lower image resolutions and sampling rates, making it a potentially useful tool to aid future automated eye-movement enabled neurologic diagnosis.

Deep learning based torsional nystagmus detection for dizziness and vertigo diagnosis

Torsional nystagmus recognition based on deep learning for vertigo diagnosis

Nystagmus patterns classification framework based on deep learning and optical flow

A Deep Learning Model for Three-Dimensional Nystagmus Detection and Its Preliminary Application

Tic Detection in Tourette Syndrome Patients Based on Unsupervised Visual Feature Learning

Nystagmus Signal Feature Extraction and Tracking for Diagnosis of the Vestibular System

A Deep-Learning Model for 3d Nystagmus Detection and its Primary Application

Vertical Nystagmus Recognition Based on Deep Learning

Sparse classification of discriminant nystagmus features using combined video-oculography tests and pupil tracking for common vestibular disorder recognition

Deep Learning-Based Nystagmus Detection for BPPV Diagnosis

1D Convolutional Neural Networks for Detecting Nystagmus

Deep Learning Detection of Subtle Torsional Eye Movements: Preliminary Results

A nystagmus extraction system using artificial intelligence for video-nystagmography

Automatic nystagmus detection and quantification in long-term continuous eye-movement data

Developing a Diagnostic Decision Support System for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Using a Deep-Learning Model

Hybrid clustering system using Nystagmus parameters discrimination for vestibular disorder diagnosis.

Multimodal deep learning-based diagnostic model for BPPV

aEYE: A deep learning system for video nystagmus detection

LAD: A Hybrid Deep Learning System for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Disorders Diagnostic

Diagnosing the benign paroxysmal positional vertigo via 1D and deep-learning composite model