Abstract:Introduction Antibiotic irrigation for treating prostheses is commonly believed to be a proper administration for those whose penile implant contracts with infection. However, there is no standard procedure for the irrigation period. Objective As a result, we encounter patients whose sinusoids were ruined from irrigation attempts for over three months. We sought to report an experience of salvaging penile implantation. Methods From 2010 to 2022, eight patients requested salvage penile implantation for treating unsuccessful inflatable implantation elsewhere. They report repeated antibiotic rescuing and wound debridement from 50 to 121 days of hospitalization. The diameter of the glans penis is measured and recorded in mm. Pelvic X-rays were made while the penis was downward and upward. One 44-year-old patient received no further salvaging penile implant because the corporeal sinusoid had too hardly fused to allow the contrast medium injection. The remaining seven received malleable types of penile implants ambulatory under acupuncture-assisted local anesthesia with which a cavernosal block must be performed in addition to a proximal dorsal nerve block, crural block, and peri penile infiltration. In addition, the novel method of glans enhancement was performed unexceptionally. The approach was longitudinal pubic (n=3) and circumferential (n=2). The pain level was assessed on the acupoint needle location or penis property. It was recorded on blood loss amount and operation times. A 32 to 35 ligation was performed at the retro-coronal venous plexus, which is readily identified by glans milking manipulation. A 5cm coroporotomy was made along the 11 or 1 o'clock position of the corpora cavernosa. To minimize the sinusoidal compression, corporal dilatation was made along the dorsal and medial directions distally and dorsolateral proximally. Neither electrocautery nor a suction apparatus was used because of minimal blood loss from manual compression. The water-tight suture was made to the tunic wound, closed continuously with 6-0 nylon with intermittent enhanced suture per centimeter. The overlying fascia layers and skin were finally closed with 6-zero chromic layer by layer. All patients received postoperative pelvic X-rays evidencing the appropriate housing of the cylinder. Sexual satisfaction was followed up yearly by the INTERNET. Results The operation time was 2.5 to 4.5 hours, and the blood loss was negligible. The pain level was more substantial at the arm acupoint at 71.4% (5/7). It was 11 to 61 months from the first and salvaging prosthesis implantation. The diameter of the glans increased from 26.0±2.3 mm to 35.3±2.2 mm. Four patients report couple satisfaction, whereas the remaining one feels male self-esteemed and female acceptable. All patients reported partial sinusoidal erection and no soft glans syndrome eventually. Conclusions A malleable penile prosthesis is beneficial for salvaging inflatable prosthesis infection. An anatomy-based corporeal dilation seems a proper way to minimize sinusoidal compression, although a larger sample size and longer follow-up are mandatory. The glans enhancement was unexceptionally attainable. Disclosure No.

Can malleable penile prosthesis implantation improve voiding dysfunction in men with concurrent erectile dysfunction and buried penis?

(387) Clinical Experience with Malleable Penile Implantation for Salvaging Inflatable Implant Infection

Efficacy and safety of malleable penile prosthesis compared to inflatable penile prosthesis in erectile dysfunction patients

Suspensory ligament release combined with acellular dermal matrix filler in infrapubic space: A new method for penile length augmentation.

"A diamond-shaped" penoplasty technique with or without concurrent suprapubic liposuction for adult-acquired buried penis: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates

(Pm-01) Sexual Satisfaction Post Penile Prosthesis Implantation

Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Chinese Patients with Severe Erectile Dysfunction: 10-Year Experience.

Clinical Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction with Penile Prosthesis Implantation for the Treatment of Severe Erectile Dysfunction

Risk and benefits of penile length preservation techniques during penile prosthesis implantation: a systematic review by the young academic urologists sexual and reproductive health working group

MP32-20 EXPETIENCE OF TRANSURETHRAL SEMINAL VESICULOSCOPY THROUGH EJACULATORY DUCT NATURAL OPENINGS

Management of the anatomically complex penile implant candidate through an infrapubic incision: a review of surgical techniques and benefits

(174) Use of Penuma® for Correction of Residual Deformity following Previous Treatment of Peyronie's disease: Case Series

Comment on: Penile prosthesis implantation is safe and effective in Peyronie's Disease patients with and without erectile dysfunction

(388) Arab Patient and Partner Satisfaction Following Malleable Penile Prosthesis Implantation in the Middle East and North Africa

(222) Simultaneous Inflatable Penile Prosthesis and Adjustable Male Sling: A Step-by-Step Surgical Technique

Response to comment on: penile prosthesis implantation is safe and effective in Peyronie's disease patients with and without erectile dysfunction

(153) Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with the Simultaneous Implant of a Penile Prosthesis: Penile Length Preservation After 10 years Follow Up

(105) Arab Patient and Partner Satisfaction Following Malleable Penile Prosthesis Implantation in North Africa and the Middle East

(314) Combing Penile Venous Stripping and Bilateral Varicocelectomy Benefit Patients with Erectile Dysfunction Secondary to Prostatectomy

Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation for the Treatment of Severe Erectile Dysfunction Following a Complex Pelvic Fracture: A Case Report

Use of Himplant® for correction of residual deformity following prior treatment of peyronie's disease: a case series