The MPA Guide: A framework to achieve global goals for the ocean
Kirsten Grorud-Colvert,Jenna Sullivan-Stack,Callum Roberts,Vanessa Constant,Naomi Kingston,Dan Laffoley,Enric Sala,Joachim Claudet,Matt Rand,Angelo Villagomez,Johnny Briggs,Russell Moffitt,Marine Deguignet,Sabine Jessen,Giuseppe Di Carlo,Paolo Guidetti,Jorge Torre,Zafer Kizilkaya,Tundi Agardy,Philippe Cury,Karen Sack,Ling Cao,Miriam Fernandez,Jane Lubchenco,Barbara Horta e Costa,Elizabeth P. Pike,Alan M. Friedlander,David A. Gill,Sarah E. Lester,Jon C. Day,Emanuel J. Gonçalves,Gabby N. Ahmadia,Natalie C. Ban,Georgina G. Gurney,Ana K. Spalding,Nathan J. Bennett,Lance E. Morgan,Ellen K. Pikitch,Emily S. Darling,Sarah O. Hameed,Jean M. Harris,Nirmal J. Shah
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf0861
IF: 56.9
2021-09-10
Science
Abstract:Consistency in conservation Marine protected areas (MPAs) are now well established globally as tools for conservation, for enhancing marine biodiversity, and for promoting sustainable fisheries. That said, which regions are labeled as MPAs varies substantially, from those that full protect marine species and prohibit human extraction to those that permit everything from intensive fishing to mining. This inconsistency can in some cases inhibit both conservation and quantifying the proportion of the marine environment that is truly protected. Grorud-Colvert et al . review the consistency of MPAs and propose a framework by which levels of protection can be evaluated and improved. —SNV
multidisciplinary sciences