Abstract:Background: Ultrasonography has been the mainstay of antenatal screening programmes in the UK for many years. Technical factors and physical limitations may result in suboptimal images that can lead to incorrect diagnoses and inaccurate counselling and prognostic information being given to parents. Previous studies suggest that the addition of in utero magnetic resonance imaging (iuMRI) may improve diagnostic accuracy for fetal brain abnormalities. These studies have limitations, including a lack of an outcome reference diagnosis (ORD), which means that improvements could not be assessed accurately. Objectives: To assess the diagnostic impact, acceptability and cost consequence of iuMRI among fetuses with a suspected fetal brain abnormality. Design: A pragmatic, prospective, multicentre, cohort study with a health economics analysis and a sociological substudy. Setting: Sixteen UK fetal medicine centres. Participants: Pregnant women aged ≥ 16 years carrying a fetus (at least 18 weeks' gestation) with a suspected brain abnormality detected on ultrasonography. Interventions: Participants underwent iuMRI and the findings were reported to their referring fetal medicine clinician. Main outcome measures: Pregnancy outcome was followed up and an ORD from postnatal imaging or postmortem autopsy/imaging collected when available. Developmental data from the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and questionnaires were collected from the surviving infants aged 2-3 years. Data on the management of the pregnancy before and after the iuMRI were collected to inform the economic evaluation. Two surveys collected data on patient acceptability of iuMRI and qualitative interviews with participants and health professionals were undertaken. Results: The primary analysis consisted of 570 fetuses. The absolute diagnostic accuracies of ultrasonography and iuMRI were 68% and 93%, respectively [a difference of 25%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 21% to 29%]. The difference between ultrasonography and iuMRI increased with gestational age. In the 18-23 weeks group, the figures were 70% for ultrasonography and 92% for iuMRI (difference of 23%, 95% CI 18% to 27%); in the ≥ 24 weeks group, the figures were 65% for ultrasonography and 94% for iuMRI (difference of 29%, 95% CI 23% to 36%). Patient acceptability was high, with at least 95% of respondents stating that they would have iuMRI again in a similar situation. Health professional interviews suggested that iuMRI was acceptable to clinicians and that iuMRI was useful as an adjunct to ultrasonography, but not as a replacement. Across a range of scenarios, iuMRI resulted in additional costs compared with ultrasonography alone. The additional cost was consistently < £600 per patient and the cost per management decision appropriately changed was always < £3000. There is potential for reporting bias from the referring clinicians on the diagnostic and prognostic outcomes. Lower than anticipated follow-up rates at 3 years of age were observed. Conclusions: iuMRI as an adjunct to ultrasonography significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy and confidence for the detection of fetal brain abnormalities. An evaluation of the use of iuMRI for cases of isolated microcephaly and the diagnosis of fetal spine abnormalities is recommended. Longer-term follow-up studies of children diagnosed with fetal brain abnormalities are required to fully assess the functional significance of the diagnoses. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN27626961. Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 49. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of ischemic brain injury

Fetal central nervous system anomalies:fast MRI vs ultrasonography

Fetal brain injury in complicated monochorionic pregnancies: diagnostic yield of prenatal MRI following surveillance ultrasound and influence on prognostic counselling

Different information by MRI compare to ultrasound in fetal intracranial space occupying lesions

Findings and differential diagnosis of fetal intracranial haemorrhage and fetal ischaemic brain injury: what is the role of fetal MRI?

Prenatal MR Imaging Diagnosis of Fetal Brain Lesion Associated with Viral Infection

Diagnosis of Fetal Neural Tube Defects by MRI

Fifty years of brain imaging in neonatal encephalopathy following perinatal asphyxia

Serial cranial ultrasonography or early MRI for detecting preterm brain injury?

Fetal neuroimaging applications for diagnosis and counseling of brain anomalies: Current practice and future diagnostic strategies

[Comparative Study of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Midline Structures of Fetal Brain].

Parental magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of fetuses with brain anomalies

Additional value of advanced neurosonography and magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses at risk for brain damage

MRI in the diagnosis of fetal developmental brain abnormalities: the MERIDIAN diagnostic accuracy study

Advanced neuroimaging in the fetal brain: An update on technical advances and clinical findings

Three-dimensional reconstruction of fetal abnormalities using ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging

The association between fetal intracranial hemorrhages detected on MRI and neurodevelopment

Usefulness of Additional Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Abnormalities

Prenatal diagnosis of microcephaly through combined MRI and ultrasonography: Analysis of a case series

Magnetic resonance imaging and tractography of sensorimotor tracts in fetuses with intraventricular hemorrhage: feasibility and added prognostic value

Intracranial hemorrhage and additional anomalies detected on prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: a large, retrospective study in two tertiary medical institutions