Fetal central nervous system anomalies:fast MRI vs ultrasonography
YANG Wen-zhong,XIA Li-ming,CHEN Xin-lin,YANG Min-jie,YANG Xiao-hong,FENG Ding-yi,HU Jun-wu,ZOU Ming-li,WANG Cheng-yuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1005-1201.2006.11.005
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the ability of fast MRI to detect fetal central nervous system(CNS)anomalies and to compare its performance with that of prenatal ultrasonography(US).Methods Forty-eight pregnant women were detected by conventional prenatal US and MRI.Twenty-two fetuses with CNS anomalies were conformed by autopsy and follow-up.The MR and US appearances of fetal CNS structure were compared to each other and to that of autopsy.Results A total of 26 CNS anomalies were identified by autopsy(n=17)and follow-up(n=9)including anencephaly(n=6),rachischisis(n=2),encephalocele(n=3),congenital hydrocephalus(n=7),alobar holoprosencephaly(n=1),porencephalia(n=3),arachnoid cyst(n=2)and choroids plexus cyst(n=2).US diagnosed 24 CNS anomalies,the correct diagnostic rate was 92.3%,the false-positive rate was 3.8%,the missed-diagnostic rate was 3.8%.MRI diagnosed 23 CNS anomalies,the correct-diagnostic rate was 88.5%,the false-positive rate was 3.8%,the missed-diagnostic rate was 7.7%.There was no difference between US and MRI(P>0.05),but MRI have larger FOV,higher tissues resolution,and can demonstrate gray-white matter in detail.Conclusions MR imaging has a similar sensitivity to that of US in the detection of fetal CNS anomalies.