Abstract:In 19th century Maxwell derived Maxwell equations from the knowledge of three experimental physical laws: the Coulomb's law, the Ampere's force law and Faraday's law of induction. However, theoretical basis for Ampere's force law and Faraday's law remains unknown to this day. Furthermore, the Lorentz force is considered as experimental phenomena, the theoretical foundation of this force is still unknown. To answer these fundamental theoretical questions, we derive Lienard Wiechert potentials, Maxwell's equations and Lorentz force from two simple postulates: (a) when all charges are at rest the Coulomb's force acts between the charges, and (b) that disturbances caused by charge in motion propagate away from the source with finite velocity. The special relativity was not used in our derivations nor the Lorentz transformation. In effect, it was shown all the electrodynamic laws, including the Lorentz force, can be derived from Coulomb's law and time retardation. This was accomplished by analysis of hypothetical experiment where test charge is at rest and where previously moving source charge stops at some time in the past. Then the generalized Helmholtz decomposition theorem, also derived in this paper, was applied to reformulate Coulomb's force acting at present time as the function of positions of source charge at previous time when the source charge was moving. From this reformulation of Coulomb's law the Lienard Wiechert potentials and Maxwell's equations were derived. In the second part of this paper, the energy conservation principle valid for moving charges is derived from the knowledge of electrostatic energy conservation principle valid for stationary charges. This again was accomplished by using generalized Helmholtz decomposition theorem. From this dynamic energy conservation principle the Lorentz force is derived.

Comments, with reply, on "Comparison of Ampere's law (ACL) and the law of Biot-Savart (LBS)" by H.A. Kalhor

Reflections on the Lumped Circuit Abstraction Principle

Comment On "Electromagnetic Radiation Under Explicit Symmetry Breaking" Reply

Electrodynamic force law controversy

Do Maxwell's equations need revision? - A methodological note

Comment on 'Electromagnetic lensing using the Aharonov-Bohm effect'

Comments on "Procedures for proper validation of record critical current density claims" by Chiara Tarantini and David C. Larbalestier

Reply to "Comment on 'Theoretical analysis of the force on the end face of a nano-filament exerted by an outgoing light pulse'"

Challenges in applying the magnetic field circulation in Ampère-Maxwell's law

Comment on: "Thermodynamic Properties and Persistent Currents of Harmonic Oscillator Under AB-Flux Field in a Point-Like Defect with Inverse Square Potential "

Reply to Comments on "Stored energies and radiation Q"

Reply to Comment on "Doppler signature in electrodynamic retarded potentials"

Comment on "Application of the Lifshitz theory to poor conductors" [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0809.3901" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.3901">arXiv:0809.3901</a>]

Comment on the elastica section in Thorne and Blandford "Modern Classical Physics", the shape of things, and the aspect ratio of reality

Comment on "Quantum waveguide array generator for performing Fourier transforms: Alternate route to quantum computing"

Reply to the Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3247v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3247v1">arXiv:0810.3247v1</a>] by G. L. Klimchitskaya et al. on "Application of the Lifshitz theory to poor conductors"

Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

Direct derivation of Lienard Wiechert potentials, Maxwell's equations and Lorentz force from Coulomb's law

Reply to Comment on 'The Law of Entropy Increase and the Meissner Effect'

Sources of E, D, B, H in electro- and magnetostatics: critical comments