Three‐Dimensional Printing Technology Based on Digital Orthopedics: 5‐Point Positioning Point‐Contact Pedicle Navigation Template in the Case of Scoliosis and Complex Pedicle
Qiling Chen,Chunshan Luo,Tingsheng Lu,Shudan Yao,Xingwei Pu,Minglu Yang,Lu Chen,Lihang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14231
2024-09-11
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:The causes of spinal deformities—including hypoplasia of the pedicle, anatomical variations, extreme rotation, or fusion of vertebral bodies—vary, making it difficult to determine the insertion point and control the insertion angle of the pedicle screw during surgery. This study innovatively designed a 5‐point positioning point‐contact pedicle navigation template, which was used to assist in the placement of pedicle screws during spinal orthopedic surgery, and evaluated its safety, accuracy, and effectiveness during use. It was found that using the 5‐point positioning point‐contact pedicle navigation template for screw placement achieved similar results to traditional screw placement based on operator experience, with fewer complications. However, it can improve surgical efficiency, shorten operation time, reduce intraoperative blood loss, reduce surgical trauma, reduce fluoroscopy times, and reduce radiation dose during surgery. Objective Imperfect fitting of the navigation template leads to prolonged surgery time and increased blood loss. These problems have not been effectively addressed in previous research. This study explores the efficacy of a novel 5‐point positioning point‐contact pedicle navigation template in complex pedicle situations in scoliosis. Methods This study employed a retrospective controlled design. From November 2019 to November 2023, 28 patients with scoliosis and complex pedicle were selected and underwent scoliosis correction surgery. A 5‐point positioning point‐contact pedicle navigation template was used intraoperatively to guide pedicle screw placement. Matched with 56 historical cases as a control group. The analysis included screw placement time, screw placement bleeding volume, fluoroscopy frequency, manual repositioning frequency, screw placement accuracy and grade, screw placement complications, and main curve correction rate. Continuous variables were compared using the independent samples t‐test. Categorical data were analyzed with the chi‐square test. Results All 28 patients successfully underwent surgery, with a total of 268 pedicle screws placed. The surgery duration ranged from 220 to 410 min, with an average of (283.16 ± 51.26) min. Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 630 to 1900 mL, with an average of (902.17 ± 361.25) mL. Pedicle screw placement time ranged from 60 to 130 min, with an average of (85.24 ± 24.65) min. Pedicle screw placement bleeding volume ranged from 40 to 180 mL, with an average of (76.47 ± 42.65) mL. Fluoroscopy frequency ranged from 3 to 7 times, with an average of (4.31 ± 1.14) times. Manual repositioning frequency ranged from 0 to 2 times, with an average of (0.46 ± 0.58) times. Pedicle screw placement grades: Grade I: 237 screws; Grade II: 25 screws; Grade III: 6 screws; Grade IV: 0 screws. There were no screw‐related complications. The correction rate ranged from 46% to 68%, with an average of (55.83 ± 9.22)%. Compared to the experienced screw group, the differences in screw placement time, screw placement bleeding volume, fluoroscopy procedures, and manual redirections were statistically significant (p
orthopedics