Abstract:Background Modern open science initiatives have implications for qualitative researchers, particularly in relation to 'open' data. Aim We describe the process of data-sharing for a qualitative interview study, to make transparent our thinking and decision-making around open data for our particular project. Methods The initial project aimed to explore perspectives of young adults on what precipitates and maintains feelings of loneliness among this age group. Participants did not necessarily need to discuss personal experiences of loneliness. 27 virtual interviews were conducted with young adults between 18 and 25 years. Results 26 participants consented to make their anonymised transcripts available via the Irish Qualitative Data Archive; 24 transcripts were archived. One excluded transcript contained very rich descriptions of niche social activities and rare life events that could identify the participant. However, redacting these details meant that there was scant information left, and what was left was divorced from the rich context in which it was provided. For a further transcript, the participant had a relatively rare combination of demographic characteristics. These, combined with the detailed discussion of participants' own characteristics and activities in the interview, meant that risk of identification of the participant was too great, even if access was restricted to educational and research use. Interestingly, one participant (whose transcript was archived) used no identifying information that definitively merited redaction or replacement, suggesting that even when participants consent to data archiving, this might shape the way in which they engage with the interview. Conclusions Data-sharing is more complex than 'open' or 'closed'. Purposeful consideration of the why and how of data-sharing can support researchers to make optimal use of participant data while being mindful of the ways in which data sharing can shape the context of qualitative data collection.

The afterlife of interviews: explicit ethics and subtle ethics in sensitive or distressing qualitative research

The Research Relationship: Negotiating Multiple Selves and Boundaries in Exploring Sensitive Topics

Interviewing people on sensitive topics: challenges and strategies

Ethical considerations when conducting joint interviews with close relatives or family: an integrative review

Considerations and recommendations for conducting qualitative research interviews with palliative and end-of-life care patients in the home setting: a consensus paper

Ethnographic closeness: methodological reflections on the interplay of engagement and detachment in immersive ethnographic research

Research with bereaved families

Engaging in a research interview: lifeworld-based learning through dialogue

Ethical Interviews in Software Engineering

Exploring possibilities for a feminist ethic of collective care in suicide research

Legal, ethical and human-rights issues related to the storage of oral history interviews in archives

Autoethnography as an ethically contested terrain: some thinking points for consideration

Stories of crime, stories of suffering: A narrative perspective on ethical issues in criminal justice counselling

The limits of oral history: ethics and methodology amid highly politicized research settings

Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research

Healthcare media interviews

11 'Open, 'closed, and in-between: a worked example of and reflections on data-sharing practices in qualitative interview research

Nomadic Ethics

Interpreting hidden meaning in qualitative research interview data: opportunities and challenges

The qualitative research interview

Confessional Journalism, Authenticity and Lived Experiences: A Case Study of News Stories Published During the Irish Abortion Referendum