Abstract:Background Evidence suggests that health care data sharing may strengthen care coordination, improve quality and safety, and reduce costs. However, to achieve efficient and meaningful adoption of health care data-sharing initiatives, it is necessary to engage all stakeholders, from health care professionals to patients. Although previous work has assessed health care professionals’ perceptions of data sharing, perspectives of the general public and particularly of seldom heard groups have yet to be fully assessed. Objective This study aims to explore the views of the public, particularly their hopes and concerns, around health care data sharing. Methods An original, immersive public engagement interactive experience was developed—The Can of Worms installation—in which participants were prompted to reflect about data sharing through listening to individual stories around health care data sharing. A multidisciplinary team with expertise in research, public involvement, and human-centered design developed this concept. The installation took place in three separate events between November 2018 and November 2019. A combination of convenience and snowball sampling was used in this study. Participants were asked to fill self-administered feedback cards and to describe their hopes and fears about the meaningful use of data in health care. The transcripts were compiled verbatim and systematically reviewed by four independent reviewers using the thematic analysis method to identify emerging themes. Results Our approach exemplifies the potential of using interdisciplinary expertise in research, public involvement, and human-centered design to tell stories, collect perspectives, and spark conversations around complex topics in participatory digital medicine. A total of 352 qualitative feedback cards were collected, each reflecting participants’ hopes and fears for health care data sharing. Thematic analyses identified six themes under hopes: enablement of personal access and ownership, increased interoperability and collaboration, generation of evidence for better and safer care, improved timeliness and efficiency, delivery of more personalized care, and equality. The five main fears identified included inadequate security and exploitation, data inaccuracy, distrust, discrimination and inequality, and less patient-centered care. Conclusions This study sheds new light on the main hopes and fears of the public regarding health care data sharing. Importantly, our results highlight novel concerns from the public, particularly in terms of the impact on health disparities, both at international and local levels, and on delivering patient-centered care. Incorporating the knowledge generated and focusing on co-designing solutions to tackle these concerns is critical to engage the public as active contributors and to fully leverage the potential of health care data use.

11 'Open, 'closed, and in-between: a worked example of and reflections on data-sharing practices in qualitative interview research

Open qualitative data: a worked example of qualitative data sharing from an interview study on loneliness in young adulthood

29 Sharing qualitative health and social care research data: key stakeholder views

Reflection over compliance: Critiquing mandatory data sharing policies for qualitative research

Data sharing practices in open access mode: a study of the willingness to share data in different disciplines

Opening a “Can of Worms” to Explore the Public's Hopes and Fears About Health Care Data Sharing: Qualitative Study

Rethinking Transparency and Rigor from a Qualitative Open Science Perspective

Building public trust and confidence in secondary use of health data for healthcare improvement and research: a qualitative study pre-protocol

Contributing to Accessibility Datasets: Reflections on Sharing Study Data by Blind People

Young people's views about consenting to data linkage: findings from the PEARL qualitative study

What ethical approaches are used by scientists when sharing health data? An interview study

‘Grey areas’: ethical challenges posed by social media-enabled recruitment and online data collection in cross-border, social science research

Qualitative research at the crossroads of open science and big data: Ethical considerations

To Share or Not to Share, That is the Question: a Qualitative Study of Chinese Astronomers’ Perceptions, Practices, and Hesitations about Open Data Sharing

"You cannot collect data using your own resources and put It on open access": Perspectives from Africa about public health data-sharing

What influences a person’s willingness to share health information for both direct care and uses beyond direct care? Findings from a focus group study in Ireland

Data sharing in cancer research: A qualitative study exploring community members’ preferences

"Data is the new oil": citizen science and informed consent in an era of researchers handling of an economically valuable resource

'You give us rangoli, we give you talk': using an art-based activity to elicit data from a seldom heard group

Research behind a webcam: an exploration of virtual interviewing with children and young people

A student's perspective of managing data collection in a complex qualitative study