The Effect of New Balls in Tennis: Four Years at Wimbledon

Jan R. Magnus,Franc J. G. M. Klaassen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00185

1999-07-01

Abstract:We analyse two often‐heard hypotheses concerning tennis‐balls. The first is: are new balls an advantage to the server? They are not (at least not at Wimbledon). However, they do affect the way that points are played. With new balls, more services are missed but this negative effect is compensated by winning more points if the second service is in. The second hypothesis is: did the softer balls in the 1995 Wimbledon championships result in lower dominance of service? The answer, again, is no. The dominance of service appears to have decreased over time even without special measures; the use of softer balls has had hardly any extra effect, at least not the balls used in 1995. If a faster decrease in the dominance of the service is deemed necessary, then stronger measures are called for. An obvious and easy‐to‐implement measure is to abolish the second service, which has the additional benefit of making matches more even and thus more attractive for spectators.