Serve efficiency development in women’s vs. men’s professional tennis

Ralph Grambow,Philipp Born,Craig O’Shannessy,Jonas Breuer,Dominik Meffert,Tobias Vogt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2022.109071
2022-01-01
Human Movement
Abstract:PurposeThe purpose was to identify possible gender-specific differences in long-term serve efficiency development in professional women’s and men’s tennis.MethodsThe analyses focused on 2 approaches: (1) total tournament comparison and (2) 2<sup>nd</sup> tournament week vs. 1<sup>st</sup> tournament week comparison. The data include all single matches at the Wimbledon Championship between 2002 and 2015 (ladies: <i>n</i> = 1771, gentlemen: <i>n</i> = 1772).ResultsThe findings showed significant development differences in favour of elite men over elite women in both comparisons. Regarding the total tournament comparison, men’s development of 2<sup>nd</sup> serve points won (<i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>r</i> = 0.86), 1st serves in (<i>p</i> < 0.05; <i>r</i> = 0.72), and double fault (<i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>r</i> = 0.85) percentages improved significantly more. As per the 2<sup>nd</sup> tournament week vs. 1<sup>st</sup> tournament week comparison, men’s development of 2<sup>nd</sup> serve points won (<i>p</i> < 0.05; <i>r</i> = 0.68) and double fault (<i>p</i> < 0.01; <i>r</i> = 0.86) percentages improved significantly more.ConclusionsThe study revealed serve efficiency development advantages for men over women in both comparisons, especially regarding the quality of the 2<sup>nd</sup> serve, whereas no development advantages in favour of women over men could be observed in any analysed parameter, indicating possible needs to adapt elite women’s coaching.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?