Abstract:Space is continuous. But the communities of researchers that study the cognitive map in non-humans are strangely divided, with debate over its existence found among behaviorists but not neuroscientists. To reconcile this and other debates within the field of navigation, we return to the concept of the parallel map theory, derived from data on hippocampal function in laboratory rodents. Here the cognitive map is redefined as the integrated map, which is a construction of dual mechanisms, one based on directional cues (bearing map) and the other on positional cues (sketch map). We propose that the dual navigational mechanisms of pigeons, the navigational map and the familiar area map, could be homologous to these mammalian parallel maps; this has implications for both research paradigms. Moreover, this has implications for the lab. To create a bearing map (and hence integrated map) from extended cues requires self-movement over a large enough space to sample and model these cues at a high resolution. Thus a navigator must be able to move freely to map extended cues; only then should the weighted hierarchy of available navigation mechanisms shift in favor of the integrated map. Because of the paucity of extended cues in the lab, the flexible solutions allowed by the integrated map should be rare, despite abundant neurophysiological evidence for the existence of the machinery needed to encode and map extended cues through voluntary movement. Not only do animals need to map extended cues but they must also have sufficient information processing capacity. This may require a specific ontogeny, in which the navigator's nervous system is exposed to naturally complex spatial contingencies, a circumstance that occurs rarely, if ever, in the lab. For example, free-ranging, flying animals must process more extended cues than walking animals and for this reason alone, the integrated map strategy may be found more reliably in some species. By taking concepts from ethology and the parallel map theory, we propose a path to directly integrating the three great experimental paradigms of navigation: the honeybee, the homing pigeon and the laboratory rodent, towards the goal of a robust, unified theory of animal navigation.

The role of visual landmarks in the avian familiar area map

Landmarks, beacons, or panoramic views: What do pigeons attend to for guidance in familiar environments?

The avian olfactory system and hippocampus: Complementary roles in the olfactory and visual guidance of homing pigeon navigation

Route following and the pigeon's familiar area map

The avian hippocampus and the hypothetical maps used by navigating migratory birds (with some reflection on compasses and migratory restlessness)

Conceptual approaches to avian navigation systems

Homing pigeon navigational ontogeny: no evidence that exposure to a novel release site is sufficient for learning

Flight patterns of monocularly occluded homing pigeons further reveal a left eye/right cerebral hemispheric advantage in the visual processing of familiar landscape/landmark features

GPS tracking technology and re-visiting the relationship between the avian visual Wulst and homing pigeon navigation

An infrasound-based avian navigational “map”

Magnetoreception and its trigeminal mediation in the homing pigeon

[Birds' sense of direction]

Do release-site biases reflect response to the Earth's magnetic field during position determination by homing pigeons?

A mechanism of compass-free migratory navigation

Conflicting evidence about long-distance animal navigation

Identifying volatile organic compounds used for olfactory navigation by homing pigeons

Only natural local odours allow homeward orientation in homing pigeons released at unfamiliar sites

The maturation of research into the avian hippocampal formation: Recent discoveries from one of the nature's foremost navigators

Navigation outside of the box: what the lab can learn from the field and what the field can learn from the lab

Pigeon navigation: exposure to environmental odours prior to release is sufficient for homeward orientation, but not for homing

Migratory birds can extract positional information from magnetic inclination and magnetic declination alone