A Handheld Robot for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery: Updated Preclinical Validation Study (IDEAL Stage 0)
Joachim Starup-Hansen,Nicola Newall,Emmanouil Dimitrakakis,Danyal Z. Khan,George Dwyer,Keshav Iyengar,Dimitrios Psychogyios,John G. Hanrahan,Siddharth Sinha,James Booker,Danail Stoyanov,Hani J. Marcus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2297-3647
2024-04-17
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base
Abstract:Background and Objectives Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) has become increasingly popular, yet anatomical constraints posed by the nose and limitations of nonarticulated instruments render EES technically challenging, with a steep associated learning curve. Therefore, we developed a handheld robot to enhance dexterity in endoscopic neurosurgical procedures. A previous trial of the robot demonstrated its potential advantages in endoscopic neurosurgery but also the need for improvements. In this study, we assess the feasibility, acceptability, and comparative performance of the updated robotic prototype (version 0.2) against standard instruments in a preclinical phantom and cadaveric trial. Methods Ethical approval was received. Participants were stratified according to their neurosurgical experience. In the phantom study, a randomized crossover design compared the robot against standard instruments at a phantom tumor resection task. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U tests and paired t -tests. In the cadaver-based user study, participants evaluated the device's functional domains through a qualitative interview design. Results In the phantom study, the device demonstrated a learning curve: initial resection attempts favored the traditional instrument (84% vs. 59%, p = 0.055), but parity was achieved by the fifth attempt (80% vs. 83%, p = 0.76). Acceptability was evident, as most clinicians (7/8) preferred the robot for its superior range, ergonomics, and precision. Also, the robot exhibited a diminished cognitive workload. The cadaveric study underscored the robot's clinical feasibility, through sufficient workspace reach and force delivery. Conclusion : Overall, our robot demonstrates promising acceptability and feasibility for endoscopic neurosurgery, yet further iterative developments are required before proceeding to in-human clinical trials. * First author equal contribution. # Senior author equal contribution. Received: 19 October 2023 Accepted: 09 March 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 01 April 2024 Article published online: 15 April 2024 © 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
surgery,clinical neurology