Can a Signal Mitigate a Dilemma? Quality Management Standards, Corruption, and Business Ethics

Barkat Ullah,Zuobao Wei,Yicheng Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3853353

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Firms operating in corrupt environments routinely face an ethical dilemma. On the one hand, bribery can be used as an efficient strategy to “get things done”. On the other hand, corruption is unethical, illegal, and a social ill that people detest. A corrupt environment is also informationally opaque, as the illegality of bribery is necessarily linked to secrecy. Hence, business strategies conducive to reducing information asymmetry help mitigate the ethical dilemma. One such strategy is signaling through adopting internationally recognized quality management standards such as ISO certifications. We examine the World Bank Enterprise Survey (WBES) data for almost 100 thousand firms from 2006-2019 across 141 mostly developing countries where corruption is rampant. We find that certified firms exhibit higher sales growth than uncertified firms. More importantly, we find that ISO adoption has a moderating effect on corruption activities and that the effect is stronger where corruption is more severe. Our findings have two important strategic implications. First, firms in developing countries can use ISO certification as a signal to overcome the inherent information asymmetry and facilitate growth. Second, ISO adoption also sends a signal to bureaucrats that certified firms have a more ethical culture, stronger internal controls and are not easy picks, thus mitigating the ethical conundrum.