Abstract:Personality and Social Psychology Review, Ahead of Print. Academic Understanding and reducing intergroup discrimination is at the forefront of psychological research. However, efforts to find flexible, scalable, and durable interventions to reduce discrimination have produced only mixed results. In this review, we highlight one potential avenue for developing new strategies for addressing discrimination: adapting prior research on debiasing—the process of lessening bias in judgment errors (e.g., motivated reasoning, overconfidence, and the anchoring heuristic). We first introduce a taxonomy for understanding intervention strategies that are common in the debiasing literature, then highlight existing approaches that have already proven successful for decreasing intergroup discrimination. Finally, we draw attention to promising debiasing interventions that have not yet been applied to the context of discrimination. A greater understanding of prior efforts to mitigate judgment biases more generally can expand efforts to reduce discrimination.Public Scientists studying intergroup biases are often concerned with lessening discrimination (unequal treatment of one social group versus another), but many interventions for reducing such biased behavior have weak or limited evidence. In this review article, we argue one productive avenue for reducing discrimination comes from adapting interventions in a separate field—judgment and decision-making—that has historically studied "debiasing": the ways people can lessen the unwanted influence of irrelevant information on decision-making. While debiasing research shares several commonalities with research on reducing intergroup discrimination, many debiasing interventions have relied on methods that differ from those deployed in the intergroup bias literature. We review several instances where debiasing principles have been successfully applied toward reducing intergroup biases in behavior and introduce other debiasing techniques that may be well-suited for future efforts in lessening discrimination.

Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

Common Method Bias: It's Bad, It's Complex, It's Widespread, and It's Not Easy to Fix

Method Bias Mechanisms and Procedural Remedies

Cross-Cultural Research Methods: Review and Prospect

Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods

Testing and Controlling for Common Method Variance: A Review of Available Methods

Invited Commentary: The Need for Cognitive Science in Methodology

Methods to Address Confounding and Other Biases in Meta-Analyses: Review and Recommendations

Potential types of bias when estimating causal effects in environmental research and how to interpret them

The biasing effect of common method variance: some clarifications

Minimizing observer bias in animal behavior studies revisited: Improvement, but a long way to go

How Can Debiasing Research Aid Efforts to Reduce Discrimination?

Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review

On Detecting Systematic Measurement Error in Cross-Cultural Research: A Review and Critical Reflection on Equivalence and Invariance Tests

The Influence of Common Method Variance in Marketing Research: Reanalysis of Past Studies Using a Marker-Variable Technique

Cognitive Biases in Fact-Checking and Their Countermeasures: A Review

Publication Bias in the Organizational Sciences

Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment

Biases in Scholarly Recommender Systems: Impact, Prevalence, and Mitigation

Quantitative bias analysis methods for summary level epidemiologic data in the peer-reviewed literature: a systematic review

The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Professionals’ Decision-Making: A Review of Four Occupational Areas