Genetic associations for two biological age measures point to distinct aging phenotypes

Chia‐Ling Kuo,Luke C. Pilling,Zuyun Liu,Janice L. Atkins,Morgan E. Levine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.13376

IF: 11.005

2021-05-26

Aging Cell

Abstract:<p>Biological age measures outperform chronological age in predicting various aging outcomes, yet little is known regarding genetic predisposition. We performed genome-wide association scans of two age-adjusted biological age measures (PhenoAgeAcceleration and BioAgeAcceleration), estimated from clinical biochemistry markers (Levine et al., 2018; Levine, 2013) in European-descent participants from UK Biobank. The strongest signals were found in the <i>APOE</i> gene, tagged by the two major protein-coding SNPs, PhenoAgeAccel—rs429358 (<i>APOE</i> e4 determinant) (<i>p</i> = 1.50 × 10⁻⁷²); BioAgeAccel—rs7412 (<i>APOE</i> e2 determinant) (<i>p</i> = 3.16 × 10⁻⁶⁰). Interestingly, we observed inverse <i>APOE</i> e2 and e4 associations and unique pathway enrichments when comparing the two biological age measures. Genes associated with BioAgeAccel were enriched in lipid related pathways, while genes associated with PhenoAgeAccel showed enrichment for immune system, cell function, and carbohydrate homeostasis pathways, suggesting the two measures capture different aging domains. Our study reaffirms that aging patterns are heterogeneous across individuals, and the manner in which a person ages may be partly attributed to genetic predisposition.</p>

cell biology,geriatrics & gerontology