Abstract:Abstract Manuscript Type Empirical Research Question/Issue We combine agency and institutional theory to explain the division of equity shares between the foreign (majority) and local (minority) partners within foreign affiliates. We posit that once the decision to invest is made, the ownership structure is arranged so as to generate appropriate incentives to local partners, taking into account both the institutional environment and the firm‐specific difficulty in monitoring. Research Findings/Insights Using a large firm‐level dataset for the period 2003–2011 from 16 Central and Eastern European countries and applying selectivity corrected estimates, we find that both weaker host country institutions and higher share of intangible assets in total assets in the firm imply higher minority equity share of local partners. The findings hold when controlling for host country effects and when the attributes of the institutional environment are instrumented. Theoretical/Academic Implications The classic view is that weak institutions lead to concentrated ownership, yet it leaves the level of minority equity shares unexplained. Our contribution uses a firm‐level perspective combined with national‐level variation in the institutional environment, and applies agency theory to explain the minority local partner share in foreign affiliates. In particular, we posit that the information asymmetry and monitoring problem in firms are exacerbated by weak host country institutions, but also by the higher share of intangible assets in total assets. Practitioner/Policy Implications Assessing investment opportunities abroad, foreign firms need to pay attention not only to features directly related to corporate governance (e.g., bankruptcy codes) but also to the broad institutional environment. In weak institutional environments, foreign parent firms need to create strong incentives for local partners by offering them significant minority shares in equity. The same recommendation applies to firms with higher shares of intangible assets in total assets.

Foreign Investors and Target Firms’ Financial Structure: Cavalry or Locusts?

Foreign investors and target firms’ financial structure

FDI and import competition and domestic firm's capital structure: Evidence from Chinese firm-level data

Effects of foreign acquisitions on R&D activity: Evidence from firm-level data for France

The Effects of Foreign Strategic Investors on Business Models in China'S Commercial Banks: Does Ownership Structure Matter?

The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Innovation: Evidence from Patent Filings and Citations in China

Multinational Enterprises, Technological Intensity and Firm Survival. Evidence from Italian Manufacturing and Services Firms

Foreign institutional investors and the value of excess cash holdings: international evidence

Impact of firm heterogeneity on direct and spillover effects of FDI: Micro-evidence from ten transition countries

FDI, financial constraint and partial ownership

Fdi, Market Signal and Financing Constraints of Firms in China

Chinese Commercial Banks: Benefits from Foreign Strategic Investors?

Effects of foreign acquisitions on financial constraints, productivity and investment in R&D of target firms in China

Identifying Fdi Spillovers

Unveiling the impact of foreign investment entry in industrial clusters: the case of Castelló and Sassuolo

FDI Effects on the Labor Market of Host Countries

Financial spillovers of foreign direct investment: Evidence from China

Institutions and Equity Structure of Foreign Affiliates

Foreign direct investment and inclusive finance: do financial markets and quality of institutions matter?

How Do Foreign Institutional Investors Enhance Firm Innovation?

The short-run effects of knowledge intensive greenfield FDI on new domestic entry