Abstract:In the 21st century, the trend of globalization expands widely and rapidly. As one of the most important drives, foreign direct investment (FDI) has been paid more and more attention for its effects on constructing the technological innovation capability and sustainable strategic competitiveness in the less developed countries. Now there are two different points of view on the effect from the entering FDI to the technological development in China: positive spillovers or negative spillovers. In fact the final result in the most of the empirical researches is an output mixed the two-sided effects. We can not only judge FDI by the final result, but also anatomize it. The research uses production function model based on panel data from 37 industrial enterprises in China from year 1998 to 2003. Most data comes from the yearbook of Chinese Industry and the yearbook of science and technology of China. It supposes that the technological spillovers follows the path from the FDI to the industrial innovative input which includes ″input structure″, ″input intensity″, then to the industrial innovative output which includes ″innovative effect″, ″innovative efficiency″, ″export competitive ability″, ″marginalization risk″. In the first part, the direct model discusses the relationship between innovative output and FDI. There are positive relationships between the entering of FDI and innovation effect, innovation efficiency and export in short time. But from the view of technological marginalization, FDI has strong influences on local companies' market reduction, technological dependence in the long run, and R&D capabilities' shrinking. In the second part, the indirect model discusses the relationship of the two innovative output variables mediated by innovative input intensity and innovative input structure. FDI impacts indirectly on innovative efficiency through influencing on innovative input intensity of the industry. And the structure of innovative fund source influences the usage efficiency of the fund and the innovative efficiency. It also partly moderates the relationship between FDI and innovative efficiency. In further study, it finds out that market growth, market competition and technological appropriation have partial mediating effects on the relationship between FDI and innovative input intensity of the industry.In summary, more and more technologies of the industries in China will come from outward sources in the future. The globalization of manufacturing has opened the opportunity window of learning for Chinese companies. And it brings big challenges at the same time.

How Do Foreign Institutional Investors Enhance Firm Innovation?

FDI, Technological Regime, and Innovative Effort: Evidence From China

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

A Study on the Effect of Spillovers of Foreign Direct Investment to Chinese Industrial Technological Innovation

The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Innovation: Evidence from Patent Filings and Citations in China

Cultural distance, foreign ownership, and corporate innovation in China

Foreign institutional ownership and corporate labor investment

Foreign Institutional Investors and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from an Emerging Economy

Do long‐term institutional investors foster corporate innovation?

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND INNOVATION: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE FIRMS’ PATENT FILINGS

Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Innovation: Evidence from China

Do Foreign Investors Improve Market Efficiency?

On “Innovation and institutional ownership”

Do Foreign Institutional Investors Improve Price Efficiency?

Nonlinear, Heterogeneous And Mediating Effects Of Institutional Ownership On Enterprise Innovation: Evidence From Chinese Listed Enterprises

Foreign institutional investors and stock return comovement

Qualified foreign institutional investors and corporate innovation: From the perspective of corporate governance

Foreign Strategic Investors and the Innovative Capacity of Domestic Banks:Empirical Evidence from 73 Commercial Banks

Shareholders at the Gate? Institutional Investors and Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions

Local Innovativeness and Knowledge Spillovers of Indigenous Firms on Foreign Firms: Evidence from China's ICT Industry

FDI and product and process innovation of SMEs in Vietnam: The role of institutions