Abstract:Research Question/Issue We examine the association between foreign institutional ownership and climate change disclosure quality from 2006 to 2018 across 34 countries. We find that firms with a higher level of foreign institutional ownership demonstrate better quality climate change disclosures, whereas domestic institutional ownership has immaterial impacts on such disclosures. We utilize a difference‐in‐differences (DiD) analysis using a firm's addition to the Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) index as an exogenous shock to control for endogeneity. Our findings are robust to various other endogeneity controls. We also establish evidence on an indirect effect of climate change disclosure quality in mediating the positive association between foreign institutional investors and firm valuation. Research Findings/Insights We find that the positive association between foreign institutional ownership and climate change disclosure quality is more pronounced for (1) firms domiciled in stakeholder‐orientated countries, (2) firms domiciled in countries that adopt emission trading schemes, and (3) firms with a greater level of information asymmetry. Additionally, our results are more robust when foreign investors are domiciled in countries that care more about the environment. Theoretical/Academic Implications Our study contributes to climate change disclosures, corporate governance, and international business literature by showing that foreign rather than domestic institutional investors contribute to improved corporate climate change disclosure quality in their portfolio firms. Practitioner/Policy Implications Our study urges regulators to increase their market oversight, especially in firms with less foreign institutional ownership. This is required because such firms are prone to exhibiting poorer accountability for their climate risk management practices, and their disclosures are bereft of effective external monitoring mechanisms.

Do Foreign Investors Improve Market Efficiency?

Do Foreign Institutional Investors Improve Price Efficiency?

Are Foreign Institutions More or Less Informed? Evidence from China's Stock Markets

Media Coverage and Investment Efficiency

Foreign institutional ownership and corporate labor investment

The impact of foreign institutional investors on the information content of Chinese stock prices

How Do Foreign Institutional Investors Enhance Firm Innovation?

Foreign institutional investors and stock return comovement

Foreign ownership and stock liquidity uncertainty

Are Foreign Investors Informed? Trading Experiences of Foreign Investors in China

Do foreign institutional investors influence corporate climate change disclosure quality? International evidence

Do Foreign Investors Make Firms More Transparent? Evidence from Korea

Foreign institutional investors and the value of excess cash holdings: international evidence

Shareholders at the Gate? Institutional Investors and Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions

Market discipline or rent extraction: Impacts of share trading by foreign institutional investors in different corporate governance and investor protection environments

Domestic vs. Foreign Institutional Investors: Who Improves ESG and Value of Chinese Companies?

Foreign Ownership and Firm Productivity: Causality and Channels

Green-selecting: Foreign institutional ownership and corporate green practices

Foreign Investors, External Monitoring, and Stock Price Crash Risk

Corporate financialization and overseas investment efficiency: Evidence from China

Foreign investment, corporate governance and performance in the Chinese listed A Share companies