Assuring Intelligent Systems: Contingency Management for UAS

Natasha Neogi,Siddhartha Bhattacharyya,Daniel Griessler,Harshitha Kiran,Marco Carvalho
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2021.3076399
IF: 8.5
2021-09-01
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Abstract:Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) collaborate with humans to operate in diverse, safety-critical applications. However, assurance technologies need to be integrated into the design process in order to guarantee safe behavior, thereby enabling UAS operations in the National Airspace System (NAS). In this paper, formal methods are integrated with learning-enabled systems representations. The generation and representation of knowledge are captured via monadic second-order logic rules in the cognitive architecture Soar. These rules are translated into timed automata, and a proof of correctness for the translation is provided so that safety and liveness properties can be checked in the formal verification environment Uppaal. This approach is agnostic to the learning mechanism used to generate the learned rules (e.g., chunking, etc.). An example of a fault-tolerant, learning-enabled UAS deciding which of four contingency procedures to execute under a lost link scenario while overflying an urban area is used to illustrate the approach.
engineering, electrical & electronic,transportation science & technology, civil
What problem does this paper attempt to address?