Towards Engineering Fair and Equitable Software Systems for Managing Low-Altitude Airspace Authorizations

Usman Gohar,Michael C. Hunter,Agnieszka Marczak-Czajka,Robyn R. Lutz,Myra B. Cohen,Jane Cleland-Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3639475.3640103

2024-02-03

Abstract:Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) have gained widespread adoption across a diverse range of applications. This has introduced operational complexities within shared airspaces and an increase in reported incidents, raising safety concerns. In response, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is developing a UAS Traffic Management (UTM) system to control access to airspace based on an sUAS's predicted ability to safely complete its mission. However, a fully automated system capable of swiftly approving or denying flight requests can be prone to bias and must consider safety, transparency, and fairness to diverse stakeholders. In this paper, we present an initial study that explores stakeholders' perspectives on factors that should be considered in an automated system. Results indicate flight characteristics and environmental conditions were perceived as most important but pilot and drone capabilities should also be considered. Further, several respondents indicated an aversion to any AI-supported automation, highlighting the need for full transparency in automated decision-making. Results provide a societal perspective on the challenges of automating UTM flight authorization decisions and help frame the ongoing design of a solution acceptable to the broader sUAS community.

Software Engineering,Artificial Intelligence,Machine Learning

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the complexity and safety issues associated with the operation of small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) in shared airspace and attempts to design a fair and reasonable software system to manage low-altitude airspace authorization.

Specifically, with the widespread application of small Unmanned Aircraft Systems in areas such as emergency response, remote sensing, agriculture, and package delivery, operations within the airspace have become increasingly complex, and the number of reported incidents has also increased. To address this challenge, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is developing a Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management (UTM) system to control airspace access based on the predicted safety performance of the drones. However, a fully automated system may have bias issues and needs to consider the safety, transparency, and fairness requirements of different stakeholders.

Therefore, the authors of the paper conducted a preliminary study by surveying the perspectives of remote drone pilots, emergency responders, and the general public to explore the factors that should be considered in an automated system. The study results indicate that flight characteristics and environmental conditions are considered the most important factors, and the capabilities of the pilot and the drone should also be taken into account. Additionally, some respondents expressed reservations about any AI-supported automated decision-making, emphasizing the necessity of transparency in the automated decision-making process. These results provide a societal perspective on the challenges of automated UTM flight authorization decisions and help guide the design of solutions that can be more widely accepted by the drone community.