A Comparison of Short‐Term and Continuous Exposures in Toxicity Tests of Produced Waters, Condensate, and Crude Oil to Marine Invertebrates and Fish
Francesca Gissi,Joanna Strzelecki,Monique T. Binet,Lisa A. Golding,Merrin S. Adams,Travis S. Elsdon,Tim Robertson,Sharon E. Hook
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5129
2021-07-29
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Abstract:<p>Petroleum hydrocarbons can be discharged into the marine environment during offshore oil and gas production or as a result of oil spills, with potential impacts on marine organisms. Ecotoxcicological assay durations (typically 24 to 96 h) used to characterise risks to exposed organisms may not always reflect realistic environmental exposure durations in a high energy offshore environment where hydrocarbons are mixed and diluted rapidly in the water column. To investigate this, we adapted three sensitive toxicity tests to incorporate a short-term pulse exposure to three petroleum-based products: a produced water (PW), the water-accommodated fraction (WAF) of a condensate, and a crude oil WAF. We measured 48-h survival of the copepod <i>Acartia sinjiensis</i>, 72-h larval development of the sea urchin <i>Heliocidaris tuberculata,</i> and 48-h embryo survival and deformities of yellowtail kingfish <i>Seriola lalandi</i>, after exposure to a dilution series of each of the three products for 2 h, 4−12 h, 24 h and for the standard duration of each toxicity test (continuous exposure). Effects on copepod survival and sea urchin larval development were significantly reduced in short-term exposures to PW and WAFs compared to continuous exposures. Fish embryos, however, showed an increased frequency of deformities at elevated concentrations regardless of exposure duration, although there was a trend towards increased severity of deformities with continuous exposure. The results demonstrate how exposure duration alters toxic response and how incorporating relevant exposure duration to contaminants into toxicity testing may aid interpretation of more realistic effects (and hence an additional line of evidence in risk assessment) in the receiving environment.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>
environmental sciences,toxicology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?