Abstract:A Social Progress Indicator is a survey instrument, which combined with objective data, can evaluate the impact and quality of state services. The areas of state intervention envisaged include child and long-term care services, education, environment, health, housing, public transport, state pension system and security of the citizen. The impact and quality of state services can determine national well-being. It is vitally important that the economic performance of the Irish state `trickles down' to its citizens by way of the high quality provision of state services, and a Social Progress Indicator can be tailored to achieve that outcome.In this discussion paper, we present the main arguments that a Social Progress Indicator can provide a valuable and novel supplementary measurement of national well-being for Ireland, and that Ireland has an opportunity to act as a global leader in this context. We also provide, at an executive level, guidelines in regard to a methodology to construct a Social Progress Indicator for Ireland. The principal arguments for a Social Progress Indicator are as follows. First, the inadequacy of conventional measurements of national performance e.g. national income, as a proxy for the state's impact on the quality of life of its citizens. Second, the scope, via a Social Progress Indicator, for the improvement of quality of life of a state's citizens, as measured by international standardized rankings e.g. European Quality of Life Survey. Third, the absence of a customer satisfaction criterion, for scientific and timely feedback, in relation to the provision and improvement of state services. Finally, the scope for applications of Social Progress Indicator, in regard to motivating state actors, across state departments, can serve to further motivate the establishment of a Social Progress Indicator. The question of how to measure the quality of delivery of state services is complex and challenging. Relying, in part at least, on people's own judgment is a convenient shortcut and potentially provides a natural way to aggregate various, and potentially diverse, experiences. In a world of misleading anecdotal evidence (i.e. 'fake' news) and media marketed opinion pieces in regard to the quality of state services, a rigorously constructed Social Progress Indicator can play a critically important and informative role. In this vein, we provide executive level recommendations on the data science of representative sampling, sub-index aggregation, and we include a justification for a pilot study and the management of user expectations. We also highlight how a machine learning approach, in the form of textual analytics, can play an important role in aggregating feedback from the citizens of the state. We provide the first evaluation of arguments for a Social Progress Indicator, as a metric to capture the quality of state services in Ireland, with a view to enhancing national well-being.

The disclosure of key performance indicators in the public sector

Public Service Performance: Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration

Plans, performance information and accountability: the case of Best Value

Organizational Performance and Measurement in the Public Sector: Toward Service, Effort and Accomplishment Reporting

Disclosing for Promotion or Perquisites: Local Government Financial Disclosure Strategy

The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: A review article

Is corporate disclosure of environmental performance indicators reliable or biased information? A look at the underlying drivers

Accountability for performance in English and Scottish fire and rescue services from 2010 to 2016

ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER THE FINANCIAL REPORTING SYSTEM

How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure

On the road to performance governance in the public domain

Where firms choose to disclose voluntary environmental information

Critical factors influencing information disclosure in public organisations

Does the Directive of the European Union on disclosure of non-financial and diversity information improve reporting?

Service performance reporting and principles-based authoritative guidance: an analysis of New Zealand higher education institutions

Incentives and disincentives for corporate environmental disclosure

Environmental Information Disclosure Programs: They Work, but Why?

Does performance disclosure affect user satisfaction, voice, and exit? Experimental evidence from service users

A Countermeasure to GDP Veneration: Social Progress Indicator

The Quality of Environmental KPI Disclosure in ESG Reporting for SMEs in Hong Kong

Performance Management in Dutch Central Government