Abstract:Corporate environmental and social reporting lacks the comparability across companies that is a characteristic of financial information. To address this weakness, Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) created analytical frameworks to measure the quality and scope of reporting relating to three focus areas: climate change, water and children’s rights. By translating information published by a global set of companies into standardized data, NBIM has constructed a dataset that can be used for analyzing and comparing companies across time and within sectors. The purpose of this project is to understand the value relevance of NBIM’s dataset. First, we model the determinants of the disclosure scores and climate change performance score. Consistent with prior literature, we find that firms that are larger, higher growth, less closely held and with higher analyst coverage tend to disclose more. We find that the climate change performance score is less a function of observable firm characteristics and is more idiosyncratic. This highlights the different dynamics of measures that capture actual performance, versus metrics that capture disclosures of efforts. Next, we take the ‘residual’ scores – the part of the scores that is uncorrelated with observable firm characteristics, industry and country membership – and test for associations with future financial performance. Across all of our models, the residual disclosure score is not robustly correlated with any metric of future financial performance. However, we find that the residual component of the climate change performance score is significantly related to future financial performance. We find even stronger associations for the subset of firms that have above median exposure to climate change risks. We perform supplementary analysis to understand the motivation behind these disclosures. We find that some firms choose to disclose more because they are currently facing more problems, as measured by the level of negative media attention that the firm receives on the focal issue. We also find that firms disclosing more in the past received more negative media attention on that focal issue in the future. These results hold after controlling for factors, such as firm size, that influence both media attention and disclosure levels. This suggests that higher disclosure around an issue is not necessarily indicative of better current or future performance on the issue but in some cases, it is a signal of future bad news. Conversely, we find a negative relation between the climate change performance score and the current level of negative media attention, suggesting that this performance measure indeed captures meaningful efforts to manage climate-related risks.

Where firms choose to disclose voluntary environmental information

Coming Clean: The Impact of Environmental Performance and Visibility on Corporate Climate Change Disclosure

Determinants of corporate environmental reporting: the importance of environmental performance and assurance

The environmental disclosures of the electricity generation industry: a global perspective

The Economic Consequences of Voluntary Environmental Information Disclosure

Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: A voluntary disclosure perspective

The Value Relevance of Corporate Sustainability Disclosures: An Analysis of a Dataset from One Large Asset Owner

Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective

Environmental information disclosure and corporate financial performance: Evidence from China

Is corporate disclosure of environmental performance indicators reliable or biased information? A look at the underlying drivers

The relationship between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical study in China

Environmental Information Disclosure in Capital Raising

Public Pressure, Social Reputation, Inside Governance and Firm Environmental Information Disclosure: the Evidence from Chinese Listed Manufacturing Firms

The Role of Voluntary Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Environmental Risk Disclosure: Australian Evidence

Transparency versus Performance in Financial Markets: The Role of CSR Communications

Factors that Drive Chinese Listed Companies in Voluntary Disclosure of Environmental Information

Incentives and disincentives for corporate environmental disclosure

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) PRACTICE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: AN INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE

Beyond compliance: evaluating the role of environmental, social and governance disclosures in enhancing firm value and performance

Environmental information disclosure and corporate performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies

The Effect of Board Characteristics on Firm Environmental Performance