Abstract:Research on discriminating behavior against ethnic minorities in everyday situations is still a rather under-researched field, since most prior research on ethnic discrimination focuses on housing markets, job markets, criminal justice, institutions or discourses. This article contributes toward filling the research-gap on everyday discrimination by bringing together prior research from sociology and social-psychology, including threat and competition theories from integration research, social identity theory, particularism-universalism theory and experimental findings on fairness norms. It conceptually advances the field by combining them into an integrated interdisciplinary approach that can examine discriminating behavior in everyday situations. This approach studies the dynamics of ingroup-outgroup relationships, fairness norms and threat in regard to negative behavior toward others (e.g., a neighbor). In particular, it focusses on the dynamics under which negative behavior is more likely toward an ethnic outgroup-person than an ingroup-person (i.e., discriminating behavior). To scrutinize the expectations derived within this framework, a factorial survey experiment was designed, implemented and analyzed (by means of multilevel mixed-effects linear regressions and average marginal effects). The survey experiment presents a hypothetical scenario between two neighbors in order to measure the effects and dynamics of ingroup-outgroup relationships, fairness norms and threat on behavior. While no significant outgroup-effect can be found in the general analysis of the main effects, more in-depth analyses show an interplay of situational cues: Outgroup-discriminating behavior becomes significantly more likely when the "actor" has low general fairness norms and/or when threat-level in a situation is low. These results foreground the importance of interdisciplinary in-depth analyses of dynamics for understanding the conditions under which discriminating behavior takes place in everyday situations—and for deriving measures that can reduce discrimination.

Disruptive Effects of Vigilance on Dominant Group Members' Treatment of Outgroup Members: Choking Versus Shining Under Pressure.

When a smile is a conflict: Affective mismatch between facial displays and group membership induces conflict and triggers cognitive control.

Responding to Microaggressions: Social Cost of Bystander Intervention Strategies

The aversive bystander effect whereby egalitarian bystanders overestimate the confrontation of prejudice

White women's automatic attentional adhesion to sexism in the face of racism

'(N)One of us but all of them!' Ingroup favouritism on individual and group levels in the context of deviant behaviour

Ethnic discrimination in neighborhood ingroup-outgroup encounters: Reducing threat-perception and increasing fairness as possible solutions

When Self-View Is at Stake: Responses to Ostracism Through the Lens of Self-Verification Theory

Ingroup Vigilance in Collectivistic Cultures.

Internal conflict and prejudice-regulation: Emotional ambivalence buffers against defensive responding to implicit bias feedback

What Makes a Young Assertive Bystander? The Effect of Intergroup Contact, Empathy, Cultural Openness, and In‐Group Bias on Assertive Bystander Intervention Intentions

Ostracism Disrupts Self-Continuity

Seeing race and seeming racist? Evaluating strategic colorblindness in social interaction.

When is computer-mediated intergroup contact most promising? Examining the effect of out-group members' anonymity on prejudice

Distress and retaliatory aggression in response to witnessing intergroup exclusion are greater on higher levels of collective narcissism

Emotion regulation in response to discrimination: Exploring the role of self-control and impression management emotion-regulation goals

Cultural Differences in Fear of Negative Evaluation After Social Norm Transgressions and the Impact on Mental Health

"It's not an overreaction": Increasing White people's acceptance of the reality of bias and receptivity to Black people's bias concerns

When the medium massages perceptions: Personal (vs. public) displays of information reduce crowding perceptions and outsider mistreatment of frontline staff.

Threshold violations in social judgment.

Does attitude importance moderate the effects of person-first language? A registered report