Abstract:No one enjoys grading, neither instructors nor students. The idea is that grades provide the required incentive to learn and act as an "objective" form of evaluation. This view is especially prevalent in STEM, where practitioners pride themselves in quantitative and objective measurements. However, the science of learning tells us that grades and ranking increase competition and stress, pushing learners to engage in tasks regardless of their effectiveness. Grades have been shown to suppress interest in learning, incentivize engagement in easier tasks, and produce shallower thinking. If wanting to learn is something students and faculty can agree on, how do we get there without grading? From psychology research, we know that feedback, separated from grades, along with opportunities to reattempt work without negative consequence, are powerful drivers of the intrinsic motivation to learn. In fact, feedback loops—trying something new, getting feedback, and making changes based on feedback - are a known developmental pathway to authentic learning. In this article, I describe an experiment with a form of ungrading that involves students in the co-creation of self-assessment criteria. The goal is to create learning feedback loops, incentivize learning for learning's sake, and give students some agency in the process of evaluation. This was conducted in an upper division Immunology course at a small liberal arts college. This paper outlines an iterative and dialogical process between students and instructional staff to craft a holistic set of criteria for the evaluation of learning. These criteria became the foundation for regular one-on-one conversations with students and a means to track progress over the semester. End-of-semester student feedback was overwhelmingly positive, citing increased motivation to learn, lower levels of anxiety, a less competitive environment, and growth as a learner. Among the few disadvantages cited were anxieties from grade ambiguity, fears about the process, and extra time, especially for the instructor. This paper highlights the ways in which this system aligns with psychosocial theories of learning, fostering an intrinsic motivation to learn utilizing principles of critical pedagogy and students as partners. It concludes with lessons learned from both the student and instructor viewpoint.

Beyond the grade: the planning, formative and summative (PFS) model of self-assessment for higher education

Assessment IS learning: developing a student‐centred approach for assessment in Higher Education

Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback

Student self-assessment and its impact on learning - a pilot study

The assessment cycle: a model for learning through peer assessment

‘Finally studying for myself’ – examining student agency in summative and formative self-assessment models

Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment

On the Development of a Computer-Based Tool for Formative Student Assessment: Epistemological, Methodological, and Practical Issues

Peer assessment, self-assessment, and resultant feedback: an examination of feasibility and reliability

Fostering student agency and motivation: co-creation of a rubric for self-evaluation in an ungraded course

Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature

Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education

Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning Through Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment: Guidelines for Classroom Implementation

Enhancing the assessment and the feedback in higher education

Formative Assessment for the Common Core Literacy Standards

Exploring teachers' attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs for implementing student self-assessment of English as a foreign language writing

Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills

Developing a scale to explore self-regulatory approaches to assessment and feedback with academics in higher education

Support for assessment practice: developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework

Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review

Towards a Success Model for Automated Programming Assessment Systems Used as a Formative Assessment Tool