Abstract:Rates of homicide risk are not evenly distributed across the US population. Prior research indicates that young males in disadvantaged urban neighborhoods are particularly vulnerable to lethal violence. The traditional criminal justice response to violent crime in the urban context has the potential to exacerbate problems, particularly when broad-based arrest sweeps and general deterrence initiatives are the standard models used by law enforcement. Recent studies suggest that alternative intervention approaches that use both specific deterrence combined with improving pro-social opportunities has shown promise in reducing violent crime in these high-risk contexts. This paper examines the changes in homicide patterns for the highest-risk populations in Indianapolis after a "pulling levers" intervention was implemented in the late 1990s to address youth, gang, and gun violence. Multilevel growth curve regression models controlling for a linear trend over time, important structural correlates of homicide across urban neighborhoods, and between-neighborhood variance estimates showed that homicide rates involving the highest-risk populations (i.e., actors 15 to 24 years old) were most likely to experience a statistically significant and substantive reduction after the intervention was implemented (IRR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.29 - 0.78). Among male actors in this age range, Black male homicide rates (IRR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.70) and White male rates (IRR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.15 - 0.79) declined substantially more than homicide rates involving actors outside the 15 to 24 years age range (IRR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.54 - 1.69). In addition, neighborhoods where specific, community-level strategies were implemented had statistically significant and substantive high-risk homicide rate declines. We conclude that further extension of the pulling levers framework appears warranted in light of the recent findings. Alternative justice strategies that rely on the threat of sanctions coupled with strengthening social service provisions, as well as risk communication aimed at high-risk individuals, appears to hold significant promise as a means to reduce lethal violence.

“We’re Blocking Youth’s Path to Crime”

Community-Driven Youth Justice and the Organizational Consequences of Coercive Governance

Some Implications for North Carolina of Recent Research in Juvenile Delinquency

Thinking, Fast and Slow? Some Field Experiments to Reduce Crime and Dropout in Chicago

Reflections on Criminal Justice Reform: Challenges and Opportunities

Ecology matters: Neighborhood differences in the protective role of self-control and social support for adolescent antisocial behavior.

Broken Windows and Community Social Control: Evidence from a Study of Street Segments

The Changing Determinants of Juvenile Crime

Building collective action at crime hot spots: Findings from a randomized field experiment

In Defense of Law and Order: Urban Space, Fear of Crime, and the Virtues of Social Control

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Centenary

Youth activism in the urban community: learning critical civic praxis within community organizations

The Effectiveness of Community Policing in Reducing Urban Violence

Modern Control Theory and the Limits of Criminal Justice

Adolescent Contact, Lasting Impact? Lessons Learned From Two Longitudinal Studies Spanning 20 Years of Developmental Science Research With Justice-System-Involved Youths

The Impact of the Communities that Care Approach in Reducing Violence and Crime Within an Urban, High-Burden Community

The police and neighborhood safety Broken Windows

Neighborhoods and adolescent health-risk behavior: an ecological network approach

Social Control Theory: The Legacy of Travis Hirschi's Causes of Delinquency

Reducing homicide risk in Indianapolis between 1997 and 2000

Neighborhood Drug Crime and Young Males' Job Accessibility