Abstract:Safety is a human right and universal need, and yet we as researchers and practitioners often take for granted the conditions that help people feel safe. In this conceptual review, we focus on factors that contribute to people's sense of safety in service of understanding how, when, and where people feel safe. Moreover, we consider how race, power, and privilege shape people's sense of safety and danger. In doing so, we highlight how public safety is not an objective or static reality but rather a political project that reflects dominant ideologies and serves state interests. We begin this conceptual review with a discussion of how public safety is a social construct whose meaning varies across time, space, and place. Next, we discuss three dominant ideologies that are embedded within collective public safety discourse: permanent bad guy syndrome, the victimization-fear paradox, and the politics of ideal victimhood. Together, these ideologies help to shape carceral public safety frameworks, which is the dominant paradigm in our culture. We then illuminate some of the underlying assumptions within carceral public safety frameworks and their implications for responses to public safety concerns, including elevating the safety concerns of dominant groups while criminalizing undesirable bodies, undermining stigmatized communities' ability to access public safety and justice, legitimizing suspicion and surveillance, incentivizing carceral responses while diverting resources from safety promotion programs, and altering public spaces. In doing so, we highlight how carceral public safety frameworks reflect and reinforce existing injustices while also contributing to the stigmatization, marginalization, and manufactured precarity of social groups deemed undesirable and therefore unworthy of protection. We conclude with a discussion of alternative models of public safety which are rooted in life-affirming frameworks, which focus on improving people's material conditions as a means of lessening and preventing the likelihood and impact of interpersonal violence.

In Defense of Law and Order: Urban Space, Fear of Crime, and the Virtues of Social Control

Does the Fear of Crime Erode Public Confidence in Policing

Urban Harmony: Balancing Fear of Crime with Sustainable and Innovative Community Development

Introducing Fear of Crime to Risk Research

Broken Windows and Community Social Control: Evidence from a Study of Street Segments

Examining the Relationship between Citizen Contact with the Community Prosecutor and Fear of Crime

Community Safety and Social Policy

Collective Efficacy, Group Threat, and Urban Change: Examining Informal Social Control Forces in Areas of Gentrification

The Utility of Social Capital and Collective Efficacy: Social Control Policy in Nonmetropolitan Settings

What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear?

Cops in crisis?: ethnographic insights on a new era of politicization, activism, accountability, and change in transatlantic policing

Self-protection, Psychological Externalities, and the Social Dynamics of Fear

How Social Media Use Mitigates Urban Violence: Communication Visibility and Third-Party Intervention Processes in Digital Urban Contexts

When safety for you means danger for me: the racial politics of carceral public safety discourse

Public Space and the Situational Conditions of Crime and Fear

The role of collective efficacy in shaping behavioral responses to fear of crime

The New Local Governance of Community Safety in England and Wales

Disorder or Disadvantage: Investigating the Tension Between Neighborhood Social Structure and the Physical Environment on Local Violence

Community safety and the quest for security: Holding back the dynamics of social exclusion

Integrating Sketch Maps with GIS to Explore Fear of Crime in the Urban Environment: A Review of the Past and Prospects for the Future

An understudied population? Exploring the factors associated with fear of crime in a semi-rural environment