Abstract:Fear of negative evaluation, defined as a sense of dread associated with being unfavorably evaluated in a social situation, is the primary factor underlying student anxiety in college science courses and is disproportionately experienced by students who are underserved in science. Yet, it is unknown why fear of negative evaluation disproportionately affects these students and what can be done to reduce student fear of negative evaluation. Academic social comparison describes how students perceive themselves compared to their peers with regard to desirability as a groupmate, the extent they fit in among others in their major, and academic talent. We hypothesize that academic social comparison mediates the relationship between student identities and fear of negative evaluation, where individuals with underserved identities in science may perceive themselves as "less than" their peers, contributing to their fear of negative evaluation. We surveyed 909 undergraduate science majors across 15 research-intensive institutions in the United States (U.S.) to assess: (1) To what extent do student identities predict fear of negative evaluation among science undergraduates? and (2) For identities that significantly predict fear of negative evaluation, to what extent does academic social comparison mediate the relationship? We used regression, single-mediator models, and multi-mediator models to address our research questions. Women/non-binary and LGBTQ + science majors reported disproportionately high fear of negative evaluation compared to men and non-LGBTQ + science majors. Women/non-binary and LGBTQ + students also expressed lower academic social comparison relative to their respective counterparts, meaning they perceive themselves as less than their peers with regard to their desirability as a groupmate, the extent to which they fit in among others in their major, and their academic talent. Academic social comparison partially mediated the relationship between fear of negative evaluation and both gender and LGBTQ + status. Major fit, defined as the extent to which students perceive they fit in among others in their major, was found to be the primary mediating subconstruct of academic social comparison for both gender and LGBTQ + identities. Women/non-binary and LGBTQ + science majors perceive themselves as less than their peers to a greater extent than men and non-LGBTQ + science majors, contributing to their higher fear of negative evaluation in college science course. Major fit, defined as the extent to which students feel they fit in with others in their major, is the subconstruct of academic social comparison that had the strongest influence on fear of negative evaluation in our sample. Academic social comparison is a promising target for future efforts aimed at decreasing fear of negative evaluation in active learning college science courses.

Project 80: A system that produces students who use need finding, targeted marketing strategies, and primary literature to address scientific misunderstandings that fuel hate and social ill

The Genotype-Tissue Expression (gtex) Project

Promoting Team Building, Collaboration and Communication Skills in Graduate Students through Interactive Scientific Retreats

Pnas201903125 1..10

An interdisciplinary national program developed at Baylor to make science exciting for all K-5 students

A Progressive Reading, Writing, and Artistic Module to Support Scientific Literacy

Catalyzing Conversations: Critical Thinking Skills to Win the Battle for Truth in the Post-Truth Era

Engage Students through Active Learning and Peer Teaching in a Prosection‐Based Anatomy Lab

Broadening Participation in the Life Sciences with Social-Psychological Interventions

Factors Influencing Student STEM Learning: Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy, 21st Century Skills, and Career Awareness

Scientist Spotlight Homework Assignments Shift Students’ Stereotypes of Scientists and Enhance Science Identity in a Diverse Introductory Science Class

Addressing Stigma by Increasing Empathy Toward Vulnerable Populations in Preprofessional Trainees: Impacts of the Generation Tomorrow Summer Health Disparities Scholars Program

Academic social comparison: a promising new target to reduce fear of negative evaluation in large-enrollment college science courses

Design and evaluation of a digital module with guided peer feedback for student learning biotechnology and molecular life sciences, attitudinal change, and satisfaction

Scientist Spotlights in Secondary Schools: Student Shifts in Multiple Measures Related to Science Identity after Receiving Written Assignments

First-generation students in rural communities: A study of effective programming components that support closing the excellence gap

Developing Science Literacy in Students and Society: Theory, Research, and Practice

Intervention initiatives to raise young people's interest and participation in STEM

Educating the Next Generation of Leading Scientists: Turning Ideas into Action

Combating Vaccine Hesitancy: Teaching the Next Generation to Navigate Through the Post Truth Era

Reading Outside the Lines: A Systematic Approach for Detecting Bias in Scientific Communication