Abstract:Problem: Misleading health information is detrimental to public health. Even physicians can be misled by biased health information; however, medical students and physicians are not taught some of the most effective techniques for identifying bias and misinformation online. Intervention: Using the stages of Kolb's experiential learning cycle as a framework, we aimed to teach 117 third-year students at a United States medical school to apply a fact-checking technique for identifying bias and misinformation called "lateral reading" through a 50-minute learning cycle in a 90-minute class. Each student's concrete experience was to independently read a biased article and rate its credibility, demonstrating their baseline skills at identifying bias. Students were given structured opportunities for reflective observation through individual and large group discussion. Students were guided through abstract conceptualization to determine techniques and frameworks utilized by fact checkers, specifically "lateral reading"-utilizing the internet to research the background of the author, organization, and citations using independent sources before exploring the article itself in depth. Students' active experimentation included re-rating the credibility of the same article and discussing further implications with classmates and instructors. Context: In January 2020, sessions were offered to third-year medical students during their required, longitudinal transition-to-residency course. Impact: Compared to baseline, when using lateral reading, students deemed the article less credible. Students' active experimentation changed whether they identified the organization and sources behind the article as credible. Notably, 86% (53/62) of students who viewed the organization positively pre-intervention did not describe the organization positively post intervention. Similarly, 66% (36/55) of students who cited the sources as positive pre-exercise changed their assessment after the exercise. While three students mentioned the author negatively pre-intervention, none of the 21 students who described the author in a negative fashion post-intervention described the author negatively pre-intervention. Positively describing the organization, author, or sources pre-intervention correlated with differences in credibility rating after the intervention. These findings indicate that teaching students to read laterally may increase their ability to detect bias in online medical information. Lessons Learned: Further research is needed to determine whether students who learned lateral reading via experiential learning will apply this skill in their education and career. Additionally, research should assess whether this skill helps future physicians counter bias and misinformation in ways that improve health.

Reading Outside the Lines: A Systematic Approach for Detecting Bias in Scientific Communication

Empowering Third-Year Medical Students to Detect Bias and Medical Misinformation Online via Experiential Learning of "Lateral Reading," A Fact-Checker's Technique

Statement of Partnership and Humility: A Structural Intervention to Improve Equity and Justice in Medical Education

Prioritizing equitable social outcomes with and for diverse readers: A conceptual framework for the development and use of justice-based reading assessment

On Bias and Fairness in NLP: Investigating the Impact of Bias and Debiasing in Language Models on the Fairness of Toxicity Detection

Visualizing Inequities: A Step Toward Equitable Student Outcomes

Informal psychology education and the fundamental attribution error: Testing the effectiveness of accessible online passages

Fostering student authorship skills in synthetic biology

On the Science of Reading: How Social Justice, Behavior Analysis, and Literacy Instruction Converge

Reducing Biases towards Minoritized Populations in Medical Curricular Content via Artificial Intelligence for Fairer Health Outcomes

Broadening Participation in the Life Sciences with Social-Psychological Interventions

An Active Learning Intervention Based on Evaluating Alternative Hypotheses Increases Scientific Literacy of Controlled Experiments in Introductory Biology

Teaching Scientific Literature Analysis: A Systematic Adoption of Skill-Building Methods to Enrich Research Training for Undergraduate Students

Fostering Critical Thinking Skills in a Master's‐Level Course via in‐Depth Analysis of Primary Literature

Fostering Educator Buy-in of Language and Literacy in the Science Classroom

A Progressive Reading, Writing, and Artistic Module to Support Scientific Literacy

Empathic Framing during Concept Development in Book Club Discussions in a Service-Learning Teacher Education Class

The SEIRA approach: course embedded activities to promote academic integrity and literacies in first year engineering

Introducing the Social Media Literacy (SMILE) model with the case of the positivity bias on social media

Improving Ethical Outcomes with Machine-in-the-Loop: Broadening Human Understanding of Data Annotations

Bias intervention messaging in student evaluations of teaching: The role of gendered perceptions of bias