Abstract:In addition to being an essential chemical for fertilizers, ammonia can also be used as a hydrogen carrier or directly as a fuel. Compared to hydrogen, the main advantages are that ammonia can be liquefied in mild conditions and the technology for ammonia shipping and pipelines already exists. Compared to carbon-based synthetic fuels, no carbon dioxide is produced by the oxidation, only water and nitrogen. The theoretical voltage of a direct ammonia fuel cell (DAFC) is 1.17 V, nearly equal to the 1.23 V of hydrogen fuel cells (HFC) but a central drawback is the slow kinetics of the ammonia oxidation reaction (AOR). The AOR is even slower than the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at the cathode, which in turn is the main voltage loss component in HFCs. Consequently, due to the AOR kinetics, DAFCs typically require significantly higher platinum group metal (PGM) catalyst loadings than HFCs for the same power output. To improve the performance of our aqueous-feed DAFC, especially using non-PGM catalysts, we carried out comparisons of catalysts and anion exchange membranes (AEM), and supplemented the comparison of power, voltage, and current parameters with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Additionally, we also compared measurements in two different test cells to try to identify the cause of measurement repeatability issues that we had when using one of the cells. Initially, we assumed that the reproducibility of catalyst deposition (or lack of it) and AEM or catalyst degradation in the ammonia-containing electrolyte had caused our repeatability problems. However, following a preliminary analysis of measurement statistics, we consider problems with the cell itself a more likely cause. The maximum power of the cell depended almost inversely on the series resistance ( R S , i.e., the high-frequency resistance/real-axis intercept of the EIS spectrum), and the current at given voltage varied more than the differences in the resistance alone could explain when most measurement parameters were not varied (e.g., ammonia and hydroxide concentrations, liquid and gas flow rates). The general inverse dependence on R S remained also when measuring the same electrodes in different cells, and the performance did not necessarily degrade over time so, clearly, degradation and differences between electrodes could not explain everything. When testing different screw torques and gaskets in our AEM electrolyser, we had noticed that the voltage differences were often high compared to the R S differences, and it is known that clamping torque can affect the operation of fuel cells and electrolysers significantly. Nevertheless, more detailed analysis is ongoing to determine possible other contributing factors, to optimize the use of the cell(s) in measurements, and to guide future work. This research was done under the TELEGRAM project. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under grant agreement No 101006941. The project started on the 1st of November 2020 with a duration of 42 months. The authors acknowledge support from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research in the framework of the project Catlab (03EW0015A). Figure 1

Performance of direct ammonia fuel cell with PtIr/C, PtRu/C, and Pt/C as anode electrocatalysts under mild conditions

Highly Active Nanoporous Pt-based Alloy As Anode and Cathode Catalyst for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells

Performance Characteristics of a Direct Ammonia Fuel Cell with an Anion Exchange Membrane

Ptirm (M=Zn, Ni) Ammonia Oxidation Catalysts for Anion-Exchange Membrane Direct Ammonia Fuel Cells

In Situ Exsolved CoFeRu Alloy Decorated Perovskite as An Anode Catalyst Layer for High‐Performance Direct‐Ammonia Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells

Improving Performance And Durability Of Low Temperature Direct Ammonia Fuel Cells: Effect Of Backpressure And Oxygen Reduction Catalysts

Ultra-Small High-Entropy Alloy as Multi-Functional Catalyst for Ammonia Based Fuel Cells

A symmetric direct ammonia fuel cell using ternary NiCuFe alloy embedded in carbon network as electrodes

Breaking the Pt Electron Symmetry and OH Spillover towards PtIr Active Center for Performance Modulation in Direct Ammonia Fuel Cell

Quantitative assessment of enhanced performance of Ru-loaded direct ammonia proton ceramic fuel cells

Efficient ammonia conversion in proton conducting fuel cells: Combined application of dendritic anodes and nanofiber catalysts

Ammonia Tolerance of Atomically Dispersed Single Metal Site Catalysts: Mechanistic Understanding and High‐Performance Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysis

Activating and stabilizing the surface of anode for high-performing direct-ammonia solid oxide fuel cells

Awakening (220) as One More Active Facet of PtMo Alloy via Single‐Atom Doping to Boost Ammonia Electrooxidation in Direct Ammonia Fuel Cell

Electrochemical Impedance Analysis of Direct Ammonia Fuel Cell Operation and Clamping Effects

Rhombic dodecahedron nanoframes of PtIrCu with high-index faceted hyperbranched nanodendrites for efficient electrochemical ammonia oxidation via preferred NH x dimerization pathways

Carbon Monoxide-Resistant Anode Catalysts for Single-Cell Direct Carbon Monoxide Fuel Cells: Binary, Ternary, And Quaternary Platinum Alloys as Anode Electrocatalysts

Performance Evaluation of Ammonia-Fueled Flat-Tube Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Different Build-in Catalysts

Self‐construction of Efficient Interfaces Ensures High‐performance Direct Ammonia Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells

Cooperative active sites on Ag2Pt3TiS6 for enhanced low‐temperature ammonia fuel cell electrocatalysis

A simple, feasible, and non-hazardous laboratory evaluation of direct ammonia solid oxide fuel cells fueled by aqueous ammonia