An Examination of the Dysfunctional Consequences of Organizational Injustice and Escapist Coping
kelly l zellars,yongmei liu,virginia bratton,robert a brymer,pamela l perrewe
2004-01-01
Abstract:A considerable amount of research has been devoted to the manner in which individuals cope with stressful situations in daily organizational life. Coping includes behavioral, cognitive, and emotional efforts to manage external and/or internal demands and primarily aims to manage stress and restore equilibrium (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984). As coping research has evolved, some researchers (see Lazarus, 1999) have focused on the trait-like aspect of coping, emphasizing the stable coping styles of individuals. Others have taken a state or situational approach, emphasizing the dynamic feature of coping and viewing coping as a process (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984; Billings and Moos, 1984). Still others take a middle ground, treating coping patterns as relatively stable, situation-specific styles that individuals develop over time and deploy in stressful situations (Koeske et al., 1993). Coping strategies cannot be understood in a generalized sense (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984; Folkman et al., 1986). Instead, coping is context-specific and, therefore, a coping strategy can be effective or ineffective, generating different consequences in different situations. Nevertheless, the preponderance of research in the coping literature has focused on individual differences such as personality types (e.g., Suls and David, 1996), negative affectivity (e.g., Lee et al., 1993), self-efficacy (e.g., Jex et al., 2001), and coping resources (e.g., Gowan et al., 1999) as antecedents of coping strategies. Far less research has directly assessed the relationship between situational factors and individuals' choice of coping strategies. This is an important omission, for not only do individuals perceive and interpret potentially stressful cues from the environment (Lazarus, 1991), but context may also determine which coping strategy works best for individuals given the immediate situation (Koeske et al., 1993; Palinkas and Browner, 1995). Thus, in order to address this issue, we examine one organizational context variable on an individual's choice of a particular coping strategy. Specifically, we examine the relationship between procedural justice and escapist coping. We also examine three affective outcomes of escapist coping: job satisfaction, strain, and intent to turnover. This study enhances the existing literature in two ways. First, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to explore the effect of perceived contextual factors (i.e., procedural justice), rather than individual differences on individual coping strategies. Second, it contributes to the turnover literature by examining the mediating process through which procedural justice influences intentions to turnover. We begin with a brief discussion of procedural justice and escapist coping, followed by the proposed relationships to affective outcomes and intentions to turnover. We then present our expected hypotheses and findings. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the potential implications for managers and offer directions for future research. PROCEDURAL JUSTICE Procedural justice, the degree to which fair procedures are perceived to be present and used in an organization (Lind and Tyler, 1988), requires individuals be given the chance to participate in decision making, be given adequate explanations for decisions, and have a clear understanding of what their roles are (Kim and Mauborgne, 1997). In recent years, there has been a significant amount of research regarding the role of procedural justice on important organizational outcomes such as organizational citizenship behavior (Spector and Fox, 2002; Moorman, 1991), organizational commitment (Rhoades et al., 2001; Flaherty and Pappas, 2000), job satisfaction (Fields et al., 2000), and intent to turnover (Roberts et al, 1999). Consistent findings indicate that procedural justice is related to positive individual and organizational outcomes and a lack of justice is associated with negative outcomes, including higher absenteeism (Cropanzano and Greenberg, 1997) and greater intentions to quit (Konovsky and Cropanzano, 1991). …