Coping Strategies Among Undergraduates: Spanish Adaptation and Validation of the Brief-COPE Inventory
Francisco D Fernández-Martín,Lorena Flores-Carmona,José L Arco-Tirado
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S356288
IF: 3.974
2022-04-20
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Francisco D Fernández-Martín, Lorena Flores-Carmona, José L Arco-Tirado Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain Correspondence: Francisco D Fernández-Martín, Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Granada, Campus Universitario de Cartuja s/n, Granada, 18071, Spain, Tel +34 958242095, Fax +34 958248975, Email Purpose: Different studies have highlighted the importance of coping strategies in stressful situations. The Coping Orientation to Problem Experienced (COPE) by Carver et al is one of the instruments that is frequently used for measuring this aspect. The aim of this study was to carry out the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brief-COPE inventory to measure coping strategies in Spanish populations. Methods: The linguistic and cultural adaptation of the Brief-COPE was carried out using the back-translation method and, after considering the results of the pilot test, the Spanish version of the instrument was configured, and subsequently administered to a convenient sample of 2135 undergraduates. A confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to examine construct validity of the Spanish adaptation of the brief-COPE; likewise, reliability was analyzed from two approaches, internal consistency and composite reliability. Concurrent validity was also tested. Results: The results showed that the Spanish version of Brief-COPE has adequate reliability values, as well as satisfactory fit indexes for the proposed 14-factor first-order structural model. Likewise, external evidence of the validity of the inventory with the variables perceived stress, level of satisfaction with life, and academic performance is provided. Conclusion: The results suggest that this instrument presents a satisfactory metric quality and, therefore, it could be useful to evaluate coping strategies, which would allow further research on its incidence and consequences on health and psychological functioning. Keywords: coping strategies, psychometric properties, Spanish adaptation, validation Coping is a variable pattern of thinking, feeling, and behavior through which a person attempts to manage specific external and/or internal demands, generated by a stressful situation, that exceed his or her resources. 1–3 This non-cognitive ability allows regulating the potential repercussions of stress at the somatic, psychological, and behavioral levels, thus facilitating the adjustment and adaptation of the person to situations of uncertainty, preserving his or her own physical and psychological integrity, mainly through the use of different strategies. 1,4 Coping strategies refer to specific actions aimed at modifying the stimulus that generates stress, as well as controlling the emotions that derive from it. 1,5 Traditionally, these strategies have been grouped into two categories: (a) problem-centered, ie, actions aimed at eliminating or reducing the impact of the stressor (active coping, planning, positive reframing, and acceptance); and (b) emotion-centered, ie, actions aimed at preventing or reducing the emotional distress or discomfort caused by a stressful situation (instrumental support, emotional support, self-blaming, venting, and religion). 2,3 However, Endler and Parker 6 suggested a third category, called avoidance-centered coping strategies, which encompasses actions aimed at avoiding stressful situations through distraction techniques (behavioral disengagement, denial, substance use, self-distraction, and humor). Stress management and the choice of the most adequate coping strategy depend on the emotional and cognitive evaluation of each person. 7 In fact, the coping strategies to use are selected depending on the stressful situation, although there is no agreement about their differential use nor is their individual or collective use. 8 The most used coping strategies seem to be problem solving, cognitive restructuring and the search for instrumental and emotional support. 9,10 However, not all coping strategies are equally effective in dealing with stressful situations. 11,12 In general terms, strategies that actively target the stressor, or the thoughts and emotions derived from it, have proven to be associated with a better adjustment to stressful situations. 1,3,4,13 Alternatively, avoidance strategies, which involve distancing oneself from the stressor and the thoughts and emotions derived from it, have been associated with a worse adaptation to such situations. 1,3,4,13 In particular, while active coping, planning, instrumental support, emotional support, positive reframing, and acceptance are often conceived as adaptive strategies, as t -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary