Homo Economicus Belief Affects Donation Willingness: the Moderated Mediation
Hao Liu,Rui Guo,Jialu Yu,Chengyi Xu,Ziyan Guo,Zhen Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/tb-2023-0237
2023-01-01
Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)
Abstract:The belief in homo economicus, which assumes that humans act rationally and are self-interested, has been linked to reduced charitable donations; however, the underlying mechanisms of this association are not well understood. To address this gap, we conducted four online experiments and sought to investigate how empathic concern, perceived necessity of donation, and contextual factor of physical harm interact to explain the relation between homo economicus belief and donation behavior. We hypothesized a chain mediation model, in which empathic concern and perceived necessity of donation would mediate the path linking homo economicus belief with donation behavior, and the degree of physical harm involved in donation scenarios would moderate the mediation effect. Experiment 1 examined whether empathic concern mediated the relation between homo economicus belief and donation behavior. We randomly assigned Chinese college students (n=117) to either the priming or control group to manipulate their beliefs in homo economicus. Both groups were then presented with the same donation scenarios and asked to report their empathic concern and the amount of money they were willing to donate. Results showed that the primed belief in homo economicus decreased donations, and this effect was fully mediated by empathic concern. Experiment 2 (n=142) further examined whether physical harm in the donation scenarios moderated the associations revealed in Experiment 1. Results indicated that empathic concern played a mediating role only when donating scenarios did not involve physical harm. When physical harm was present in the donating scenarios, participants showed more empathic concern and were willing to donate more money than when physical harm was not present, regardless of their beliefs in homo economicus. Building upon the first two experiments, Experiment 3 (n=368) and Experiment 4 (n=225) used different methods to manipulate participants' beliefs in homo economicus and examined the role of perceived necessity of donation - a latent factor represented by participants' self-reported perceived severity of the need, efficacy of the donation, and social responsibility of the donation. Results showed that participants perceived higher levels of donation necessity in scenarios involving physical harm, which led to greater amounts of donations. This could explain the nonsignificant effect of homo economicus belief on donation behavior in scenarios involving physical harm. In sum, our findings suggest that stronger belief in homo economicus may lead to lower levels of empathic concern and perceived necessity of donation, which in turn decreases donations. However, the presence of physical harm in donation scenarios may increase people's awareness of necessity of donation and thus amplify the beneficial effects of empathic concern on donation behavior. Our study supports a chain mediation model that sheds new light on the psychological mechanisms underpinning individual differences in money donations. The series of experiments not only enrich our understanding of how homo economicus belief influences charitable donations, but also offer strategies for increasing donations by promoting empathic concern and perceived necessity of donation among people with diverse views of homo economicus.