Abstract:Respiratory droplets serve as a viable transmission mechanism for many viruses and other pathogens. Facemasks are commonly used to minimize the risk of this transmission. However, information on the size-resolved filtration efficiency of commonly available commercial facemasks is not readily available in the literature. To fill this gap, the current study performs aerosolized chamber experiments to evaluate the filtration efficiencies of commonly available commercial facemasks' materials in a size range of 0.3-10 µm. Results rank the performance of filtration through commercial facemasks' materials as follows (values in brackets indicate the average filtration efficiencies across 0.3-10 µm): 6-Layer N95 mask (0.918) > N95 mask - without valve (0.88) > KN95 mask (0.84) > N95 mask -with valve (0.834) > Heavy knitted cotton mask (0.808) > Surgical mask (0.778) > Cotton mask-2 layers (0.744) > Nylon fabric mask-2 layers (0.740) > T-shirt fabric mask-2 layers (0.708) > T-shirt fabric mask-1 layer (0.648). The size-resolved filtration efficiencies through the material across the evaluated commercial facemasks ranged from 38-83% in the size range of 0.3-0.5 µm, 55-88% in the size range of 0.5-1 µm, 69-93% in the size range of 1-2.5 µm, 76-96% in the size range of 2.5-5 µm, and 86-99% in the size range of 5-10 µm. Subsequently, the filtration efficiencies of materials post washing (with detergent in warm water and allowing to dry completely) were also evaluated. The average reduction in filtration efficiencies post washing are as follows: 6-Layer N95 mask: 3%, N95 mask - without valve: 2%, KN95 mask: 4%, N95 mask -with valve: 3%, Heavy knitted cotton mask: 4%, Surgical mask: 18%, Cotton mask-2 layers: 11%, Nylon fabric mask-2 layers: 6%, T-shirt fabric mask-2 layers: 6%, T-shirt fabric mask-1 layer: 8%. This decrease in the filtration efficiency was more pronounced for the sub-micron particles than the super-micron ones.Implications: Facemasks are commonly used to minimize the risk of pathogens through ambient air transmission. However, information on the size-resolved filtration efficiency of commonly available commercial facemasks materials is not readily available in the literature. To fill this gap, the current study performs aerosolized chamber experiments to evaluate the filtration efficiencies of commonly available commercial facemasks materials in a size range of 0.3-10 µm. The performance of the commercial facemasks materials as follows in the order of (values in brackets indicate the average filtration efficiencies across 0.3-10 µm): 6-Layer N95 mask (0.918) > N95 mask - without valve (0.88) > KN95 mask (0.84) > N95 mask -with valve (0.834) > Heavy knitted cotton mask (0.808) > Surgical mask (0.778) > Cotton mask-2 layers (0.744) > Nylon fabric mask-2 layers (0.740) > T-shirt fabric mask-2 layers (0.708) > T-shirt fabric mask-1 layer (0.648). The choice of facemask is greatly driven by the size of viable respiratory droplets that need to be eliminated. If droplets with particle size less than 0.5 µm are required to be filtered, N95 masks without the valve or more layers are preferred. If the primary objective is to filter particles between 0.5-1 µm, then N95 (both with or without valves) or KN95 masks are recommended. Surgical masks and heavy knitted cotton masks may also be used for this purpose, but with caution.

Evaluation of filtration effectiveness of various types of facemasks following with different sterilization methods

Decontamination of N95 masks for re-use employing 7 widely available sterilization methods

Evaluating the filtration efficiency of commercial facemasks' materials against respiratory aerosol droplets

Exploring Reusability of Disposable Face Masks: Effects of Disinfection Methods on Filtration Efficiency, Breathability, and Fluid Resistance

Developing home-disinfection and filtration efficiency improvement methods for N95 respirators and surgical facial masks: stretching supplies and better protection during the ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic

Feasibility study of reusing surgical masks and evaluation of the effectiveness of different disinfection methods

Size-Dependent Filtration Efficiency of Alternative Facemask Filter Materials

Can sterilization of disposable face masks be an alternative for imported face masks? A nationwide field study including 19 sterilization departments and 471 imported brand types during COVID-19 shortages

Influence of different treatment conditions on the filtration performance of conventional electret melt blown non-woven and novel nano FFP2 masks

Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks

Filtration performances of non-medical materials as candidates for manufacturing facemasks and respirators

Autoclave sterilization and ethanol treatment of re-used surgical masks and N95 respirators during COVID-19: impact on their performance and integrity

Particle-Size-Dependent Filtration Efficiency, Breathability, and Flow Resistance of Face Coverings and Common Household Fabrics Used for Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Cloth Face Coverings: Effect of Decontamination Method on Fabric Performance

Viral Filtration Efficiency of Fabric Masks Compared with Surgical and N95 Masks

Comparison of Two Methods for Sterilization of Filtering Facepiece Respirators Worn for Extended Periods During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Experimental Laboratory Study

Particle Filtration Efficiency, Breathability, and Reusability of Common Masks

Filtration efficiency, breathability, and reusability of improvised materials for face masks

Fabrication of a High-Performance and Reusable Planar Face Mask in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Evaluation of masks and mask material suitability for bioaerosol capture