Particle Filtration Efficiency, Breathability, and Reusability of Common Masks

Heikki Junninen,Nieves Maria Flores March,Marko Vana,Kalju Tamme,Helina Lipp,Sander Mirme,Siim Pikker,Tareq Hussein,Markku Kulmala

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.240021

2024-01-01

Aerosol and Air Quality Research

Abstract:The Filtration efficiency (FE) and breathability were evaluated for commonly used masks (total of 350 of commercial and home-made) before and after disinfection by one of three options: washing machine (60 degrees C, degrees C, 90 minutes), boiling in water (5 minutes), or holding in hot water (decreasing temperature from 90 degrees C degrees C to 80 degrees C, degrees C, 5 minutes). The overall average breathability was 97 Pa cm(-2) with disposable masks had pressure difference better than community mask requirements. According to our results, the FE of 0.3 mu m (FE0.3 mu m) 0.3 mu m ) > 80% for 136 masks and that for 3 mu m (FE3 mu m) 3 mu m ) > 80% for 194 masks. In general, disposable masks had better FE (FE0.3 mu m = 89% and FE3 mu m = 96%) than multiple-usable masks (FE (0.3 mu m) = 39% and FE3 mu m = 66%). The commercial masks (FE0.3 mu m = 55% and FE3 mu m = 75%) had higher performance than self-made masks (FE0.3 mu m = 21% and FE3 mu m = 54%). An additional layer in a commercial mask enhanced FE0.3 mu m from 35% to 84% and FE3 mu m from 69% to 94%. The FE (likely remained more than 50%) was not affected significantly after cleaning a mask and the breathability was not changed. It is concluded here that disposable masks and respirators can be washed and used several times without losing much quality of the masks regarding the FE and breathability. The best masks for FE were N95 respirators, but they had relatively low breathability. When also counting the breathability, the equally good performance was for commercial multiple- usable masks with filtering layer and disposable masks.