Abstract:Background The success of a Mendelian randomization (MR) study critically depends on the validity of the assumptions underlying MR. We focus on detecting heterogeneity (also known as horizontal pleiotropy) in two‐sample summary‐data MR. A popular approach is to apply Cochran's Q statistic method, developed for meta‐analysis. However, Cochran's Q statistic, including its modifications, is known to lack power when its degrees of freedom are large. Furthermore, there is no theoretical justification for the claimed null distribution of the minimum of the modified Cochran's Q statistic with exact weighting (Qmin ), although it seems to perform well in simulation studies. Method The principle of our proposed method is straightforward: if a set of variables are valid instruments, then any linear combination of these variables is still a valid instrument. Specifically, this principle holds when these linear combinations are formed using eigenvectors derived from a variance matrix. Each linear combination follows a known normal distribution from which a p value can be calculated. We use the minimum p value for these eigenvector‐based linear combinations as the test statistic. Additionally, we explore a modification of the modified Cochran's Q statistic by replacing the weighting matrix with a truncated singular value decomposition. Results Extensive simulation studies reveal that the proposed methods outperform Cochran's Q statistic, including those with modified weights, and MR‐PRESSO, another popular method for detecting heterogeneity, in cases where the number of instruments is not large or the Wald ratios take two values. We also demonstrate these methods using empirical examples. Furthermore, we show that Qmin does not follow, but is dominated by, the claimed null chi‐square distribution. The proposed methods are implemented in an R package iGasso. Conclusions Dimension reduction techniques are useful for generating powerful tests of heterogeneity in MR.

Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test.

Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis

A note on extending Scheffé's modified multiple-comparison procedure to other analysis situations

A Tutorial on Testing, Visualizing, and Probing an Interaction Involving a Multicategorical Variable in Linear Regression Analysis

Detecting Interaction Effects in Moderated Multiple Regression With Continuous Variables Power and Sample Size Considerations

How to define and test an indirect moderation model: The missing link in regression-based path models

[An aligned rank test for a nonparametric analysis of the two-way interaction]

Testing Moderation in Business and Psychological Studies with Latent Moderated Structural Equations

Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions

Testing Psychological Hypotheses Addressing Two Independent Variables and One Dependent Variable

A tutorial on using the paired t test for power calculations in repeated measures ANOVA with interactions

Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations.

A powerful approach to the study of moderate effect modification in observational studies

One step at a time: A statistical approach for distinguishing mediators, confounders, and colliders using direction dependence analysis.

Interpreting moderated multiple regression: A comment on Van Iddekinge, Aguinis, Mackey, and DeOrtentiis (2018).

How Many Participants Do I Need to Test an Interaction? Conducting an Appropriate Power Analysis and Achieving Sufficient Power to Detect an Interaction

Two-Stage Testing in a high dimensional setting

Testing Similarity Effects with Dyadic Response Surface Analysis

Two-Sample Tests for High-Dimensional Linear Regression with an Application to Detecting Interactions.

Powerful Test of Heterogeneity in Two‐Sample Summary‐Data Mendelian Randomization

Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis: A Powerful Approach for Examining Moderation and Overcoming Limitations of Difference Scores