Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis: A Powerful Approach for Examining Moderation and Overcoming Limitations of Difference Scores

Linda Rhoades Shanock,Benjamin E. Baran,William A. Gentry,Stacy Clever Pattison,Eric D. Heggestad
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
IF: 6.604
2010-06-06
Journal of Business and Psychology
Abstract:Polynomial regression with response surface analysis is a sophisticated statistical approach that has become increasingly popular in multisource feedback research (e.g., self-observer rating discrepancy). The approach allows researchers to examine the extent to which combinations of two predictor variables relate to an outcome variable, particularly in the case when the discrepancy (difference) between the two predictor variables is a central consideration. We believe this approach has potential for application to a wide variety of research questions. To enhance interest and use of this technique, we provide ideas for future research directions that might benefit from the application of this analytic tool. We also walk through a step-by-step example of how to conduct polynomial regression and response surface analysis and provide all the tools you will need to do the analyses and graph the results (including SPSS syntax, formulas, and a downloadable Excel spreadsheet). Our example involves how discrepancies in perceived supervisor and organizational support relate to affective commitment. Finally, we discuss how this approach is a better, more informative alternative to difference scores and can be applied to the examination of two-way interactions in moderated regression.
psychology, applied,business
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to more effectively examine the combined effect of the relationship between two predictor variables on the outcome variable in multi - source feedback research (for example, the difference between self - and observer - ratings), especially when the discrepancy between these two predictor variables is a core consideration. Traditional difference score methods or traditional moderated regression analysis have limitations in dealing with such problems, while polynomial regression combined with response surface analysis provides a more powerful and informative method to overcome these limitations. Specifically, this method can: 1. **Examine how the consistency between two predictor variables affects the outcome variable**: By consistency, it means that the levels of the two predictor variables are basically the same. Using this method, it can be determined how the consistency between the two predictor variables affects the outcome variable (such as performance). 2. **Examine how the degree of difference between two predictor variables affects the outcome variable**: The degree of difference refers to how much the levels of the two predictor variables differ. It can be determined how the outcome variable changes as the difference between the two predictor variables increases. 3. **Examine how the direction of difference between two predictor variables affects the outcome variable**: The direction of difference refers to which predictor variable has a higher value. It can be determined how the outcome variable changes when one predictor variable is higher than the other. The paper uses a specific example, that is, how the difference between perceived supervisor support and organizational support affects affective commitment, to show how to conduct polynomial regression and response surface analysis, and provides detailed steps and tools (such as SPSS syntax, formulas, and downloadable Excel spreadsheets) to help researchers analyze and plot the results. In addition, the paper also discusses the advantages of this method over traditional moderated regression and proposes possible future research directions to expand the application range of this technique.