Abstract:In the early 1970s, we and others in the economics profession became enamored with the notion of externalties—a cost or benefit imposed on or provided to others but not taken into account by the economic agents who generate the effect. We, and others, seemed to see external effects everywhere. There was polluted water and air, noise, urban blight, traffic congestion, and other features of modern life that seemed to call out for some form of corrective action. As the externalities revolution unfolded, economists and other social scientists overlooked the importance of evolved legal and other institutions that formally and informally establish property and liability rules that cause decision makers to face the cost of their actions, including what otherwise could be external costs imposed on unwilling third parties. While markets seemed always to fail, political institutions were seen systematically as without blemish, or so it seemed. It was this two-pronged failure, 1) a failure to consider and state assumptions about background institutional arrangements and 2) a disregard for special interest politics, that became the Achilles Heel of the otherwise elegant externality arguments. Eventually, it was the modern institutionalists, scholars who focused on laws, regulation, and rules of the marketplace, who attempted to close the lid and drive the nails on the externality coffin. In this paper, we reach back to 1920 and trace the rise and decline of the policy importance of externalities theory. Beginning with A. C. Pigou and Alfred Marshall, our story includes some of the great figures in economic history of thought. But while theory was being built, institutions were overlooked. Pigou continues to be a dominant player in the story until the 1960s and 1970s when externalities theory was challenged by James M. Buchanan, Ronald Coase and other scholars. It is here in the twilight years of the externalities revolution that the prospects of government failure are raised as being more daunting than the likelihood of market failure. Finally, in the late 1970s and beyond, the externalities revolution is replaced by a property rights revolution.

Principles of Environmental Economics and the Political Economy of West German Environmental Policy

Environmental Law and Economics in Europe

Economic Instruments in German Environmental Policy

Environmental Policy with Green Consumerism

The Neoclassical Decision-Making Paradigm and Environmental Valuation: An Environmental Ethics Perspective

Supporting environmental protection in good and bad economic circumstances

Environmental Economics and Agricultural Policy

Post-environmentalism: an internal critique

The role of political parties in multi-level environmental governance in the European Union and Germany

Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: traditions, trends, perspectives

Public opinion and environmental policy output: a cross-national analysis of energy policies in Europe

Differentiation of Green Taxes: A Political-Economy Analysis for Germany

The Politics of Market-Based Environmental Regulation: Continuity and Change in Air Pollution Control Policy Conflict

The Environmental State: Nature and the Politics of Environmental Protection

THE END OF THE EXTERNALITY REVOLUTION

German energy transition (Energiewende) and what politicians can learn for environmental and climate policy

In Whose Interest? Pressure Group Politics, Economic Competition and Environmental Regulation

Trade and environment : theory and policy in the context of EU enlargement and economic transition

Trade and the environment, trade policies and environmental policies—How do they interact?

Collective actors and potential alliances for eco-social policies in Germany

The Search for a Balance between the Principles of Freedom of Economic Activity and Environmental Protection in German Constitutional Law